MySQL手动注册binlog文件造成主从异常的原因
程序员文章站
2022-03-07 19:05:42
一、问题来源有一个朋友@水米田 问我，基于position的主从。他做了如下的操作将备份的一些binlog文件加入到了目录中修改index文件，加入了这些binlog文件flush binary lo...
一、问题来源
有一个朋友@水米田 问我，基于position的主从。他做了如下的操作
将备份的一些binlog文件加入到了目录中
修改index文件，加入了这些binlog文件
flush binary logs
然后整个主从环境大量延迟。
二、朋友的测试
下面是另外一个朋友@徐晨亮的测试：
master上：
(root:db1@xucl:10:30:22)[(none)]> show binary logs;
+---------------------+-----------+
| log_name | file_size |
+---------------------+-----------+
| mysql-binlog.000031 | 1019 |
| mysql-binlog.000032 | 424 |
| mysql-binlog.000033 | 244 |
| mysql-binlog.000034 | 2332 |
| mysql-binlog.000035 | 2134 |
| mysql-binlog.000036 | 845915 |
| mysql-binlog.000037 | 11735 |
| mysql-binlog.000038 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000039 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000040 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000041 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000042 | 234 |
+---------------------+-----------+
12 rows in set (0.00 sec)
(root:db1@xucl:10:30:34)[(none)]> purge binary logs to 'mysql-binlog.000039';
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
(root:db1@xucl:10:30:49)[(none)]> show binary logs;
+---------------------+-----------+
| log_name | file_size |
+---------------------+-----------+
| mysql-binlog.000039 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000040 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000041 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000042 | 234 |
+---------------------+-----------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
执行插入数据
(root:db1@xucl:10:31:23)[xucl]> insert into t values(9,9);
将备份的binlog拷贝回原先的目录并修改index文件进行注册
[root@izbp12nspj47ypto9t6vyez logs]# ll
总用量 884
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 1019 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000031
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 424 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000032
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 244 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000033
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 2332 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000034
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 2134 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000035
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 845915 5月 20 22:03 mysql-binlog.000036
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 11735 5月 20 22:05 mysql-binlog.000037
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 284 5月 20 22:06 mysql-binlog.000038
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 284 5月 21 10:28 mysql-binlog.000039
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 284 5月 21 10:28 mysql-binlog.000040
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 284 5月 21 10:28 mysql-binlog.000041
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 491 5月 21 10:31 mysql-binlog.000042
-rw-r----- 1 mysql mysql 204 5月 21 10:30 mysql-binlog.index
主库flush binary logs
(root:db1@xucl:10:32:51)[(none)]> flush binary logs;
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.01 sec)
(root:db1@xucl:10:32:57)[(none)]> show binary logs;
+---------------------+-----------+
| log_name | file_size |
+---------------------+-----------+
| mysql-binlog.000031 | 1019 |
| mysql-binlog.000032 | 424 |
| mysql-binlog.000033 | 244 |
| mysql-binlog.000034 | 2332 |
| mysql-binlog.000035 | 2134 |
| mysql-binlog.000036 | 845915 |
| mysql-binlog.000037 | 11735 |
| mysql-binlog.000038 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000039 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000040 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000041 | 284 |
| mysql-binlog.000042 | 541 |
| mysql-binlog.000043 | 234 |
+---------------------+-----------+
13 rows in set (0.00 sec)
此时，slave报错如下：
(root:db1@xucl:10:31:05)[(none)]> show slave status\g
*************************** 1. row ***************************
slave_io_state:
master_host: 127.0.0.1
master_user: repl
master_port: 3306
connect_retry: 60
master_log_file: mysql-binlog.000035
read_master_log_pos: 194
relay_log_file: izbp12nspj47ypto9t6vyez-relay-bin.000011
relay_log_pos: 373
relay_master_log_file: mysql-binlog.000035
slave_io_running: no
slave_sql_running: yes
replicate_do_db:
replicate_ignore_db:
replicate_do_table:
replicate_ignore_table:
replicate_wild_do_table:
replicate_wild_ignore_table:
last_errno: 0
last_error:
skip_counter: 0
exec_master_log_pos: 194
relay_log_space: 648
until_condition: none
until_log_file:
until_log_pos: 0
master_ssl_allowed: no
master_ssl_ca_file:
master_ssl_ca_path:
master_ssl_cert:
master_ssl_cipher:
master_ssl_key:
seconds_behind_master: null
master_ssl_verify_server_cert: no
last_io_errno: 1236
last_io_error: got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'cannot replicate gtid-transaction when @@global.gtid_mode = off, at file /storage/single/mysql3306/logs/mysql-binlog.000035, position 194.; the first event 'mysql-binlog.000039' at 234, the last event read from '/storage/single/mysql3306/logs/mysql-binlog.000035' at 259, the last byte read from '/storage/single/mysql33'
last_sql_errno: 0
last_sql_error:
replicate_ignore_server_ids:
master_server_id: 3306
master_uuid: e8bdf01a-c79b-11e8-82b3-00163e088352
master_info_file: mysql.slave_master_info
sql_delay: 0
sql_remaining_delay: null
slave_sql_running_state: slave has read all relay log; waiting for more updates
master_retry_count: 86400
master_bind:
last_io_error_timestamp: 190521 10:32:57
last_sql_error_timestamp:
master_ssl_crl:
master_ssl_crlpath:
retrieved_gtid_set:
executed_gtid_set: 4c423515-6661-11e9-b767-00163e088352:1-7,
e8bdf01a-c79b-11e8-82b3-00163e088352:1-57192
auto_position: 0
replicate_rewrite_db:
channel_name:
master_tls_version:
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
从slave上的报错来看，在主库flush binary logs后，从库又读取注册的binlog并且又apply了
三、现象说明
从整个测试来看，mysql视乎将手动注册的文件进行了传输和应用。报错是因为这个库以前是gitd_mode=on的，但是测试的时候已经关闭了gtid_mode，改为了position的模式，这个报错是因为dump线程会进行检测：
这个图来自我新写的一个系列（暂时还没发布，大概年底才能写好）。不管怎么说，dump线程已经在开始传输老的binlog文件了。那么原因是什么呢？下面我们将进行解释。
四、flush binary logs对binlog的操作
flush binary logs 将包含如下操作：
- 获取新的binlog文件名字
- 关闭旧的binlog
- 关闭index file
- 打开index file
- 打开新的binlog
- 将新的binlog加入到indexfile
具体可以参考函数mysql_bin_log::new_file_impl。其中要说明一下获取新的binlog文件名字是通过函数find_uniq_filename实现的，其中包含如下代码：
file_info= dir_info->dir_entry;
for (i= dir_info->number_off_files ; i-- ; file_info++)
{
if (strncmp(file_info->name, start, length) == 0 &&
is_number(file_info->name+length, &number,0))
{
set_if_bigger(max_found, number);
}
}
...
*next= (need_next || max_found == 0) ? max_found + 1 : max_found;
大概意思就是扫描index file文件里面的binlog文件，获取其序号最高的一个，然后加1。栈帧如下：
#0 find_uniq_filename (name=0x7fffec5ec6d0 "/mysqldata/mysql3340/log/binlog", next=0x7fffec5ec678, need_next=true) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:3679 #1 0x000000000187d208 in generate_new_log_name (new_name=0x7fffec5ec6d0 "/mysqldata/mysql3340/log/binlog", new_ext=0x0, log_name=0x7ffedc011520 "/mysqldata/mysql3340/log/binlog", is_binlog=true) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:3767 #2 0x0000000001884fdb in mysql_bin_log::new_file_impl (this=0x2e83640, need_lock_log=false, extra_description_event=0x0) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:7175 #3 0x0000000001884cbb in mysql_bin_log::new_file_without_locking (this=0x2e83640, extra_description_event=0x0) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:7099 #4 0x0000000001886b6b in mysql_bin_log::rotate (this=0x2e83640, force_rotate=true, check_purge=0x7fffec5ecbfb) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:7775 #5 0x0000000001886d53 in mysql_bin_log::rotate_and_purge (this=0x2e83640, thd=0x7ffedc000b90, force_rotate=true) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:7846
因此即便我们手动修改了index file，flush binary logs却不会有问题，因为它实际扫描了index file文件。
同时我们也看到flush binary logs重新加载了index file，这个时候手动修改的index file就生效了，使用show binary logs就能查看到你加入的文件了。
五、主从问题的产生
binlog切换后，dump线程也需要读取下一个binlog文件。我们来看看它是怎么确认读取哪一个文件的。
在函数sender.run()中可以找到循环每个binlog文件的代码。下面一句是寻找下一个binlog文件：
int error= mysql_bin_log.find_next_log(&m_linfo, 0);
mysql_bin_log.find_next_log 包含的代码：
my_b_seek(&index_file, linfo->index_file_offset);//进行偏移量偏移 linfo->index_file_start_offset= linfo->index_file_offset; length=my_b_gets(&index_file, fname, fn_reflen));//读取文件名字 ... if(normalize_binlog_name(full_fname, fname, is_relay_log)) ... linfo->index_file_offset= my_b_tell(&index_file);//偏移量从新记录以备下一次使用
我们能够看到dump线程并没有实际扫描整个index文件，而是通过一个index文件的偏移量进行读取。如果手动修改index文件那么偏移量就出现了错乱。因此dump发送的下一个文件将是不确定的。因此出现了发送手动注册的binlog文件给从库的现象，这种情况下可能出现下面情况：
- 如果是gtid_mode 关闭，使用position那么这种情况一定报错，比如重复的行。
- 如果是gtid_mode 和auto_position=1，那么dump线程会进行gtid的过滤不发送，因为event不发送所以延迟会持续一段时间为0。
- 如果是gtid_mode 和auto_position=0，那么sql线程应用gitd_event的时候会进行过滤，延迟可能出现很大的情况。
尽管gtid可能可以屏蔽这种问题，但是dump线程已经在考虑发送老的binlog文件了，这是不合适的。
六、purge binary logs能够维护这个偏移量
为什么purge binary logs不会出现问题呢，因为在purge binary logs的语句下，会维护这个偏移量如下：
virtual void operator()(thd *thd)
{
log_info* linfo;
mysql_mutex_lock(&thd->lock_thd_data);
if ((linfo= thd->current_linfo))//b binlog.cc:2829
{
/*
index file offset can be less that purge offset only if
we just started reading the index file. in that case
we have nothing to adjust.
*/
if (linfo->index_file_offset < m_purge_offset)
linfo->fatal = (linfo->index_file_offset != 0);
else
linfo->index_file_offset -= m_purge_offset;
}
mysql_mutex_unlock(&thd->lock_thd_data);
我们可以看到linfo->index_file_offset -= m_purge_offset;这样一个语句。下面是栈帧：
#0 adjust_offset::operator() (this=0x7fffec5ec720, thd=0x7ffedc000be0) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:2831 #1 0x0000000000eef320 in do_thd::operator() (this=0x7fffec5ec6a0, thd=0x7ffedc000be0) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/mysqld_thd_manager.cc:46 #2 0x0000000000eefa0f in std::for_each<thd**, do_thd> (__first=0x3003358, __last=0x3003368, __f=...) at /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.7/../../../../include/c++/4.4.7/bits/stl_algo.h:4200 #3 0x0000000000eeefc0 in global_thd_manager::do_for_all_thd (this=0x3003340, func=0x7fffec5ec720) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/mysqld_thd_manager.cc:273 #4 0x000000000187ae0a in adjust_linfo_offsets (purge_offset=0) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:2873 #5 0x0000000001883239 in mysql_bin_log::remove_logs_from_index (this=0x2e83640, log_info=0x7fffec5ec7d0, need_update_threads=true) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:6352 #6 0x0000000001883676 in mysql_bin_log::purge_logs (this=0x2e83640, to_log=0x7fffec5eca80 "/mysqldata/mysql3340/log/binlog.000001", included=false, need_lock_index=true, need_update_threads=true, decrease_log_space=0x0, auto_purge=false) at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:6469 #7 0x000000000187b4b5 in purge_master_logs (thd=0x7ffee0000c00, to_log=0x7ffee0006600 "binlog.000001") at /mysqldata/percona-server-locks-detail-5.7.22/sql/binlog.cc:3127
七、测试position模式下的报错
1、 环境
mysql> show binary logs;
+---------------+-----------+
| log_name | file_size |
+---------------+-----------+
| binlog.000001 | 198 |
| binlog.000002 | 154 |
+---------------+-----------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
mysql> show create table testcp \g;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
table: testcp
create table: create table `testcp` (
`id` int(11) not null,
primary key (`id`)
) engine=innodb default charset=utf8
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
error:
no query specified
2、执行一个语句
主库：
mysql> insert into testcp values(20); query ok, 1 row affected (0.43 sec) mysql> select * from testcp; +----+ | id | +----+ | 10 | | 20 | +----+ 2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
从库：
mysql> show slave status \g;
*************************** 1. row ***************************
slave_io_state: waiting for master to send event
master_host: 192.168.99.41
master_user: repl
master_port: 3340
connect_retry: 60
master_log_file: binlog.000002
read_master_log_pos: 417
relay_log_file: relay.000004
relay_log_pos: 624
relay_master_log_file: binlog.000002
slave_io_running: yes
slave_sql_running: yes
...
mysql> select * from testcp;
+----+
| id |
+----+
| 10 |
| 20 |
+----+
这个时候dump线程index file偏移指针如下：
3、主库执行purge binary logs
做之前拷贝原有binlog.000001为binlog.000001bak因为等会要拷贝回去
mysql> purge binary logs to 'binlog.000002'; query ok, 0 rows affected (3.14 sec) mysql> show binary logs; +---------------+-----------+ | log_name | file_size | +---------------+-----------+ | binlog.000002 | 417 | +---------------+-----------+ 1 row in set (0.00 sec)
因为purge binary logs命令会维护偏移指针，这个时候dump线程的index file偏移指针如下：
4、手动更改
将binlog.000001bak拷贝为binlog.000001，然后修改index file将binlog.000001加入回去，然后flush binary logs如下：
mysql> flush binary logs; query ok, 0 rows affected (0.15 sec) mysql> show binary logs; +---------------+-----------+ | log_name | file_size | +---------------+-----------+ | binlog.000001 | 198 | | binlog.000002 | 461 | +---------------+-----------+ 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
手动完成这个工作并不会维护dump线程的index file偏移指针，因此如下：
就这样dump线程重新发送了一次binlog.000002的内容，position的从库只能报错了如下：
mysql> select * from replication_applier_status_by_worker \g
*************************** 1. row ***************************
channel_name:
worker_id: 1
thread_id: null
service_state: off
last_seen_transaction: anonymous
last_error_number: 1062
last_error_message: worker 1 failed executing transaction 'anonymous' at master log binlog.000002, end_log_pos 386; could not execute write_rows event on table testmts.testcp; duplicate entry '20' for key 'primary', error_code: 1062; handler error ha_err_found_dupp_key; the event's master log binlog.000002, end_log_pos 386
last_error_timestamp: 2019-05-21 14:46:26
八、总结
这种操作非常不规范，如果实在要这么做考虑如下步骤：
- 关闭全部的从库
- 手动注册binlog文件，修改index 文件
- flush binary logs
- 启动从库
这种情况下将会重新初始化dump的偏移量指针，应该是没有问题的。还是尽量不要考虑这么做。
以上就是mysql手动注册binlog文件造成主从异常的原因的详细内容，更多关于mysql 主从异常的资料请关注其它相关文章！