欢迎您访问程序员文章站本站旨在为大家提供分享程序员计算机编程知识!
您现在的位置是: 首页

Kubernetes Eviction Manager源码分析

程序员文章站 2022-04-15 18:45:01
...

http://blog.csdn.net/WaltonWang/article/details/56329109

摘要:本文作为Kubernetes Eviction Manager工作机制分析的后续篇,主要通过源码分析对其工作机制进行解读。

Kubernetes Eviction Manager介绍及工作原理

这部分内容,请看我的前一篇博文:Kubernetes Eviction Manager工作机制分析

Kubernetes Eviction Manager源码分析

Kubernetes Eviction Manager在何处启动

Kubelet在实例化一个kubelet对象的时候,调用eviction.NewManager新建了一个evictionManager对象。

pkg/kubelet/kubelet.go:273
func NewMainKubelet(kubeCfg *componentconfig.KubeletConfiguration, kubeDeps *KubeletDeps, standaloneMode bool) (*Kubelet, error) {

    ...

    thresholds, err := eviction.ParseThresholdConfig(kubeCfg.EvictionHard, kubeCfg.EvictionSoft, kubeCfg.EvictionSoftGracePeriod, kubeCfg.EvictionMinimumReclaim)
    if err != nil {
        return nil, err
    }
    evictionConfig := eviction.Config{
        PressureTransitionPeriod: kubeCfg.EvictionPressureTransitionPeriod.Duration,
        MaxPodGracePeriodSeconds: int64(kubeCfg.EvictionMaxPodGracePeriod),
        Thresholds:               thresholds,
        KernelMemcgNotification:  kubeCfg.ExperimentalKernelMemcgNotification,
    }
    ...

    // setup eviction manager
    evictionManager, evictionAdmitHandler, err := eviction.NewManager(klet.resourceAnalyzer, evictionConfig, killPodNow(klet.podWorkers, kubeDeps.Recorder), klet.imageManager, kubeDeps.Recorder, nodeRef, klet.clock)

    if err != nil {
        return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to initialize eviction manager: %v", err)
    }
    klet.evictionManager = evictionManager
    klet.admitHandlers.AddPodAdmitHandler(evictionAdmitHandler)
    ...
}

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29

kubelet执行Run方法开始工作时,启动了一个goroutine,每5s执行一次updateRuntimeUp。在updateRuntimeUp中,待确认runtime启动成功后,会调用initializeRuntimeDependentModules完成runtime依赖模块的初始化工作。

pkg/kubelet/kubelet.go:1219
func (kl *Kubelet) Run(updates <-chan kubetypes.PodUpdate) {
    go wait.Until(kl.updateRuntimeUp, 5*time.Second, wait.NeverStop)
}


pkg/kubelet/kubelet.go:2040
func (kl *Kubelet) updateRuntimeUp() {
    ...

    kl.oneTimeInitializer.Do(kl.initializeRuntimeDependentModules)

    ...
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14

再跟踪到initializeRuntimeDependentModules的代码可见,runtime的依赖模块包括cadvisor和evictionManager,初始化的工作其实就是分别调用它们的Start方法进行启动。

pkg/kubelet/kubelet.go:1206
func (kl *Kubelet) initializeRuntimeDependentModules() {
    if err := kl.cadvisor.Start(); err != nil {
        // Fail kubelet and rely on the babysitter to retry starting kubelet.
        // TODO(random-liu): Add backoff logic in the babysitter
        glog.Fatalf("Failed to start cAdvisor %v", err)
    }
    // eviction manager must start after cadvisor because it needs to know if the container runtime has a dedicated imagefs
    if err := kl.evictionManager.Start(kl, kl.getActivePods, evictionMonitoringPeriod); err != nil {
        kl.runtimeState.setInternalError(fmt.Errorf("failed to start eviction manager %v", err))
    }
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

因此,从这里开始就进入到evictionManager的分析了。

Kubernetes Eviction Manager的定义

从上面的分析可见,kubelet在启动过程中进行runtime依赖模块的初始化过程中,将evictionManager启动了。先别急,我们必须先来看看Eviction Manager是如何定义的。

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:40
// managerImpl implements Manager
type managerImpl struct {
    //  used to track time
    clock clock.Clock
    // config is how the manager is configured
    config Config
    // the function to invoke to kill a pod
    killPodFunc KillPodFunc
    // the interface that knows how to do image gc
    imageGC ImageGC
    // protects access to internal state
    sync.RWMutex
    // node conditions are the set of conditions present
    nodeConditions []v1.NodeConditionType
    // captures when a node condition was last observed based on a threshold being met
    nodeConditionsLastObservedAt nodeConditionsObservedAt
    // nodeRef is a reference to the node
    nodeRef *v1.ObjectReference
    // used to record events about the node
    recorder record.EventRecorder
    // used to measure usage stats on system
    summaryProvider stats.SummaryProvider
    // records when a threshold was first observed
    thresholdsFirstObservedAt thresholdsObservedAt
    // records the set of thresholds that have been met (including graceperiod) but not yet resolved
    thresholdsMet []Threshold
    // resourceToRankFunc maps a resource to ranking function for that resource.
    resourceToRankFunc map[v1.ResourceName]rankFunc
    // resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs maps a resource to an ordered list of functions that know how to reclaim that resource.
    resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs map[v1.ResourceName]nodeReclaimFuncs
    // last observations from synchronize
    lastObservations signalObservations
    // notifiersInitialized indicates if the threshold notifiers have been initialized (i.e. synchronize() has been called once)
    notifiersInitialized bool
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36

managerImpl就是evictionManager的具体定义,重点关注:

  • config - evictionManager的配置,包括:

    • PressureTransitionPeriod( –eviction-pressure-transition-period)
    • MaxPodGracePeriodSeconds(–eviction-max-pod-grace-period)
    • Thresholds(–eviction-hard, –eviction-soft)
    • KernelMemcgNotification(–experimental-kernel-memcg-notification)
  • killPodFunc - evict pod时kill pod的接口,kubelet NewManager的时候,赋值为killPodNow方法(pkg/kubelet/pod_workers.go:285)
  • imageGC - 当node出现diskPressure condition时,imageGC进行unused images删除操作以回收disk space。
  • summaryProvider - 提供node和node上所有pods的最新status数据汇总,既NodeStats and []PodStats。
  • thresholdsFirstObservedAt - 记录threshold第一次观察到的时间。
  • thresholdsMet - 保存已经触发但还没解决的Thresholds,包括那些处于grace period等待阶段的Thresholds。
  • resourceToRankFunc - 定义各种Resource进行evict 挑选时的排名方法。
  • resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs - 定义各种Resource进行回收时调用的方法。
  • lastObservations - 上一次获取的eviction signal的记录,确保每次更新thresholds时都是按照正确的时间序列进行。
  • notifierInitialized - bool值,表示threshold notifier是否已经初始化,以确定是否可以利用kernel memcg notification功能来提高evict的响应速度。目前创建manager时该值为false,是否要利用kernel memcg notification,完全取决于kubelet的--experimental-kernel-memcg-notification参数。

kubelet在NewMainKubelet时调用eviction.NewManager进行evictionManager的创建,eviction.NewManager的代码很简单,就是赋值。

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:79
// NewManager returns a configured Manager and an associated admission handler to enforce eviction configuration.
func NewManager(
    summaryProvider stats.SummaryProvider,
    config Config,
    killPodFunc KillPodFunc,
    imageGC ImageGC,
    recorder record.EventRecorder,
    nodeRef *v1.ObjectReference,
    clock clock.Clock) (Manager, lifecycle.PodAdmitHandler, error) {
    manager := &managerImpl{
        clock:           clock,
        killPodFunc:     killPodFunc,
        imageGC:         imageGC,
        config:          config,
        recorder:        recorder,
        summaryProvider: summaryProvider,
        nodeRef:         nodeRef,
        nodeConditionsLastObservedAt: nodeConditionsObservedAt{},
        thresholdsFirstObservedAt:    thresholdsObservedAt{},
    }
    return manager, manager, nil
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23

但是,有一点很重要,NewManager不但返回evictionManager对象,还返回了一个lifecycle.PodAdmitHandler实例evictionAdmitHandler,它其实和evictionManager的内容相同,但是不同的两个实例。evictionAdmitHandler用来kubelet创建Pod前进行准入检查,满足条件后才会继续创建Pod,通过Admit(attrs *lifecycle.PodAdmitAttributes)方法来检查,代码如下:

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:102
// Admit rejects a pod if its not safe to admit for node stability.
func (m *managerImpl) Admit(attrs *lifecycle.PodAdmitAttributes) lifecycle.PodAdmitResult {
    m.RLock()
    defer m.RUnlock()
    if len(m.nodeConditions) == 0 {
        return lifecycle.PodAdmitResult{Admit: true}
    }

    // the node has memory pressure, admit if not best-effort
    if hasNodeCondition(m.nodeConditions, v1.NodeMemoryPressure) {
        notBestEffort := qos.BestEffort != qos.GetPodQOS(attrs.Pod)
        if notBestEffort || kubepod.IsCriticalPod(attrs.Pod) {
            return lifecycle.PodAdmitResult{Admit: true}
        }
    }

    // reject pods when under memory pressure (if pod is best effort), or if under disk pressure.
    glog.Warningf("Failed to admit pod %v - %s", format.Pod(attrs.Pod), "node has conditions: %v", m.nodeConditions)
    return lifecycle.PodAdmitResult{
        Admit:   false,
        Reason:  reason,
        Message: fmt.Sprintf(message, m.nodeConditions),
    }
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25

上述Pod Admit逻辑,正是Kubernetes Eviction Manager工作机制分析中Scheduler一节提到的EvictionManager对Pod调度的逻辑影响:

Kubelet会定期的将Node Condition传给kube-apiserver并存于etcd。kube-scheduler watch到Node Condition Pressure之后,会根据以下策略,阻止更多Pods Bind到该Node。

Node Condition Scheduler Behavior
MemoryPressure No new BestEffort pods are scheduled to the node.
DiskPressure No new pods are scheduled to the node.

killPodNow的代码,后面再分析。

基本上,这一小节我们把evictionManager是什么以及怎么来的问题搞清楚了。下面我们来看看evictionManager的启动过程。

Kubernetes Eviction Manager的启动

上面分析过,kubelet在启动过程中进行runtime依赖模块的初始化过程中,将evictionManager启动了(kl.evictionManager.Start(kl, kl.getActivePods, evictionMonitoringPeriod)),那我们先来看看Start方法:

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:126
// Start starts the control loop to observe and response to low compute resources.
func (m *managerImpl) Start(diskInfoProvider DiskInfoProvider, podFunc ActivePodsFunc, monitoringInterval time.Duration) error {
    // start the eviction manager monitoring
    go wait.Until(func() { m.synchronize(diskInfoProvider, podFunc) }, monitoringInterval, wait.NeverStop)
    return nil
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

很简单,启动一个goroutine,每执行完一次m.synchronize就间隔monitoringInterval(10s)的时间再次执行m.synchronize,如此反复。

接下来,就是evictionManager的关键工作流程了:

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:181
// synchronize is the main control loop that enforces eviction thresholds.
func (m *managerImpl) synchronize(diskInfoProvider DiskInfoProvider, podFunc ActivePodsFunc) {
    // if we have nothing to do, just return
    thresholds := m.config.Thresholds
    if len(thresholds) == 0 {
        return
    }

    // build the ranking functions (if not yet known)
    if len(m.resourceToRankFunc) == 0 || len(m.resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs) == 0 {
        // this may error if cadvisor has yet to complete housekeeping, so we will just try again in next pass.
        hasDedicatedImageFs, err := diskInfoProvider.HasDedicatedImageFs()
        if err != nil {
            return
        }
        m.resourceToRankFunc = buildResourceToRankFunc(hasDedicatedImageFs)
        m.resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs = buildResourceToNodeReclaimFuncs(m.imageGC, hasDedicatedImageFs)
    }

    // make observations and get a function to derive pod usage stats relative to those observations.
    observations, statsFunc, err := makeSignalObservations(m.summaryProvider)
    if err != nil {
        glog.Errorf("eviction manager: unexpected err: %v", err)
        return
    }

    // attempt to create a threshold notifier to improve eviction response time
    if m.config.KernelMemcgNotification && !m.notifiersInitialized {
        glog.Infof("eviction manager attempting to integrate with kernel memcg notification api")
        m.notifiersInitialized = true
        // start soft memory notification
        err = startMemoryThresholdNotifier(m.config.Thresholds, observations, false, func(desc string) {
            glog.Infof("soft memory eviction threshold crossed at %s", desc)
            // TODO wait grace period for soft memory limit
            m.synchronize(diskInfoProvider, podFunc)
        })
        if err != nil {
            glog.Warningf("eviction manager: failed to create hard memory threshold notifier: %v", err)
        }
        // start hard memory notification
        err = startMemoryThresholdNotifier(m.config.Thresholds, observations, true, func(desc string) {
            glog.Infof("hard memory eviction threshold crossed at %s", desc)
            m.synchronize(diskInfoProvider, podFunc)
        })
        if err != nil {
            glog.Warningf("eviction manager: failed to create soft memory threshold notifier: %v", err)
        }
    }

    // determine the set of thresholds met independent of grace period
    thresholds = thresholdsMet(thresholds, observations, false)

    // determine the set of thresholds previously met that have not yet satisfied the associated min-reclaim
    if len(m.thresholdsMet) > 0 {
        thresholdsNotYetResolved := thresholdsMet(m.thresholdsMet, observations, true)
        thresholds = mergeThresholds(thresholds, thresholdsNotYetResolved)
    }

    // determine the set of thresholds whose stats have been updated since the last sync
    thresholds = thresholdsUpdatedStats(thresholds, observations, m.lastObservations)

    // track when a threshold was first observed
    now := m.clock.Now()
    thresholdsFirstObservedAt := thresholdsFirstObservedAt(thresholds, m.thresholdsFirstObservedAt, now)

    // the set of node conditions that are triggered by currently observed thresholds
    nodeConditions := nodeConditions(thresholds)

    // track when a node condition was last observed
    nodeConditionsLastObservedAt := nodeConditionsLastObservedAt(nodeConditions, m.nodeConditionsLastObservedAt, now)

    // node conditions report true if it has been observed within the transition period window
    nodeConditions = nodeConditionsObservedSince(nodeConditionsLastObservedAt, m.config.PressureTransitionPeriod, now)

    // determine the set of thresholds we need to drive eviction behavior (i.e. all grace periods are met)
    thresholds = thresholdsMetGracePeriod(thresholdsFirstObservedAt, now)

    // update internal state
    m.Lock()
    m.nodeConditions = nodeConditions
    m.thresholdsFirstObservedAt = thresholdsFirstObservedAt
    m.nodeConditionsLastObservedAt = nodeConditionsLastObservedAt
    m.thresholdsMet = thresholds
    m.lastObservations = observations
    m.Unlock()

    // determine the set of resources under starvation
    starvedResources := getStarvedResources(thresholds)
    if len(starvedResources) == 0 {
        glog.V(3).Infof("eviction manager: no resources are starved")
        return
    }

    // rank the resources to reclaim by eviction priority
    sort.Sort(byEvictionPriority(starvedResources))
    resourceToReclaim := starvedResources[0]
    glog.Warningf("eviction manager: attempting to reclaim %v", resourceToReclaim)

    // determine if this is a soft or hard eviction associated with the resource
    softEviction := isSoftEvictionThresholds(thresholds, resourceToReclaim)

    // record an event about the resources we are now attempting to reclaim via eviction
    m.recorder.Eventf(m.nodeRef, v1.EventTypeWarning, "EvictionThresholdMet", "Attempting to reclaim %s", resourceToReclaim)

    // check if there are node-level resources we can reclaim to reduce pressure before evicting end-user pods.
    if m.reclaimNodeLevelResources(resourceToReclaim, observations) {
        glog.Infof("eviction manager: able to reduce %v pressure without evicting pods.", resourceToReclaim)
        return
    }

    glog.Infof("eviction manager: must evict pod(s) to reclaim %v", resourceToReclaim)

    // rank the pods for eviction
    rank, ok := m.resourceToRankFunc[resourceToReclaim]
    if !ok {
        glog.Errorf("eviction manager: no ranking function for resource %s", resourceToReclaim)
        return
    }

    // the only candidates viable for eviction are those pods that had anything running.
    activePods := podFunc()
    if len(activePods) == 0 {
        glog.Errorf("eviction manager: eviction thresholds have been met, but no pods are active to evict")
        return
    }

    // rank the running pods for eviction for the specified resource
    rank(activePods, statsFunc)

    glog.Infof("eviction manager: pods ranked for eviction: %s", format.Pods(activePods))

    // we kill at most a single pod during each eviction interval
    for i := range activePods {
        pod := activePods[i]
        status := v1.PodStatus{
            Phase:   v1.PodFailed,
            Message: fmt.Sprintf(message, resourceToReclaim),
            Reason:  reason,
        }
        // record that we are evicting the pod
        m.recorder.Eventf(pod, v1.EventTypeWarning, reason, fmt.Sprintf(message, resourceToReclaim))
        gracePeriodOverride := int64(0)
        if softEviction {
            gracePeriodOverride = m.config.MaxPodGracePeriodSeconds
        }
        // this is a blocking call and should only return when the pod and its containers are killed.
        err := m.killPodFunc(pod, status, &gracePeriodOverride)
        if err != nil {
            glog.Infof("eviction manager: pod %s failed to evict %v", format.Pod(pod), err)
            continue
        }
        // success, so we return until the next housekeeping interval
        glog.Infof("eviction manager: pod %s evicted successfully", format.Pod(pod))
        return
    }
    glog.Infof("eviction manager: unable to evict any pods from the node")
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
  • 143
  • 144
  • 145
  • 146
  • 147
  • 148
  • 149
  • 150
  • 151
  • 152
  • 153
  • 154
  • 155
  • 156
  • 157
  • 158

代码写的非常工整,注释也很到位,很棒。关键流程如下:

  • 通过buildResourceToRankFuncbuildResourceToNodeReclaimFuncs分别注册Evict Pod时各种Resource的排名函数和回收Node Resource的Reclaim函数。
  • 通过makeSignalObservations从cAdvisor中获取Eviction Signal Observation和Pod的StatsFunc(后续对Pods进行Rank时需要用)。
  • 如果kubelet配置了--experimental-kernel-memcg-notification且为true,则通过startMemoryThresholdNotifier启动soft & hard memory notification,当system usage第一时间达到soft & hard memory thresholds时,会立刻通知kubelet,并触发evictionManager.synchronize进行资源回收的流程。这样提高了eviction的实时性。
  • 根据从cAdvisor数据计算得到的Observation(observasions)和配置的thresholds通过thresholdsMet计算得到此次Met的thresholds。
  • 再根据从cAdvisor数据计算得到的Observation(observasions)和thresholdsMet通过thresholdsMet计算得到已记录但还没解决的thresholds,然后与上一步中的thresholds进行合并。
  • 根据lastObservations中Signal的时间,对比observasions的中Signal中的时间,过滤thresholds。
  • 更新thresholdsFirstObservedAtnodeConditions
  • 过滤出那些从observed time到now,已经历过grace period时间的thresholds。
  • 更新evictionManager对象的内部数据: nodeConditions,thresholdsFirstObservedAt,nodeConditionsLastObservedAt,thresholds,observations。
  • 根据thresholds得到starvedResources,并进行排序,如果memory属于starvedResources,则memory排序第一。
  • 取starvedResources排第一的Resource,调用reclaimNodeLevelResources对Node上这种Resource进行资源回收。如果回收完后,available满足thresholdValue+evictionMinimumReclaim,则流程结束,不再evict user-pods。
  • 如果reclaimNodeLevelResources后,还不足以达到要求,则会继续evict user-pods,首先根据前面buildResourceToRankFunc注册的方法对所有active Pods进行排序。
  • 按照前面的排序,顺序的调用killPodNow将选出的pod干掉。如果kill某个pod失败,则会跳过这个pod,再按顺序挑下一个pod进行kill。只要某个pod kill成功,就返回结束,也就是说这个流程中,最多只会kill最多一个Pod。

上面流程中,有两个最关键的步骤,回收节点资源(reclaimNodeLevelResources)和evict user-pods(killPodNow)。

pkg/kubelet/eviction/eviction_manager.go:340
// reclaimNodeLevelResources attempts to reclaim node level resources.  returns true if thresholds were satisfied and no pod eviction is required.
func (m *managerImpl) reclaimNodeLevelResources(resourceToReclaim v1.ResourceName, observations signalObservations) bool {
    nodeReclaimFuncs := m.resourceToNodeReclaimFuncs[resourceToReclaim]
    for _, nodeReclaimFunc := range nodeReclaimFuncs {
        // attempt to reclaim the pressured resource.
        reclaimed, err := nodeReclaimFunc()
        if err == nil {
            // update our local observations based on the amount reported to have been reclaimed.
            // note: this is optimistic, other things could have been still consuming the pressured resource in the interim.
            signal := resourceToSignal[resourceToReclaim]
            value, ok := observations[signal]
            if !ok {
                glog.Errorf("eviction manager: unable to find value associated with signal %v", signal)
                continue
            }
            value.available.Add(*reclaimed)

            // evaluate all current thresholds to see if with adjusted observations, we think we have met min reclaim goals
            if len(thresholdsMet(m.thresholdsMet, observations, true)) == 0 {
                return true
            }
        } else {
            glog.Errorf("eviction manager: unexpected error when attempting to reduce %v pressure: %v", resourceToReclaim, err)
        }
    }
    return false
}


pkg/kubelet/pod_workers.go:283
// killPodNow returns a KillPodFunc that can be used to kill a pod.
// It is intended to be injected into other modules that need to kill a pod.
func killPodNow(podWorkers PodWorkers, recorder record.EventRecorder) eviction.KillPodFunc {
    return func(pod *v1.Pod, status v1.PodStatus, gracePeriodOverride *int64) error {
        // determine the grace period to use when killing the pod
        gracePeriod := int64(0)
        if gracePeriodOverride != nil {
            gracePeriod = *gracePeriodOverride
        } else if pod.Spec.TerminationGracePeriodSeconds != nil {
            gracePeriod = *pod.Spec.TerminationGracePeriodSeconds
        }

        // we timeout and return an error if we don't get a callback within a reasonable time.
        // the default timeout is relative to the grace period (we settle on 2s to wait for kubelet->runtime traffic to complete in sigkill)
        timeout := int64(gracePeriod + (gracePeriod / 2))
        minTimeout := int64(2)
        if timeout < minTimeout {
            timeout = minTimeout
        }
        timeoutDuration := time.Duration(timeout) * time.Second

        // open a channel we block against until we get a result
        type response struct {
            err error
        }
        ch := make(chan response)
        podWorkers.UpdatePod(&UpdatePodOptions{
            Pod:        pod,
            UpdateType: kubetypes.SyncPodKill,
            OnCompleteFunc: func(err error) {
                ch <- response{err: err}
            },
            KillPodOptions: &KillPodOptions{
                PodStatusFunc: func(p *v1.Pod, podStatus *kubecontainer.PodStatus) v1.PodStatus {
                    return status
                },
                PodTerminationGracePeriodSecondsOverride: gracePeriodOverride,
            },
        })

        // wait for either a response, or a timeout
        select {
        case r := <-ch:
            return r.err
        case <-time.After(timeoutDuration):
            recorder.Eventf(pod, v1.EventTypeWarning, events.ExceededGracePeriod, "Container runtime did not kill the pod within specified grace period.")
            return fmt.Errorf("timeout waiting to kill pod")
        }
    }
}
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81

讲到这里,整个evictionManager的主要流程都分析完了。

总结

  • kubelet在NewMainKubelet时创建了evictionManager。
  • kubelet在启动过程中进行runtime依赖模块的初始化过程中,将evictionManager启动了。
  • 整个EvictionManager工作流程中两个最关键的步骤是:回收节点资源(reclaimNodeLevelResources)和evict user-pods(killPodNow)。
  • 每次evict pods的流程中,最多只能成功kill一个pod,如果kill某个pod时候,会从排序好的pods中选择下一个进行kill,直到kill成功或者遍历完本节点所有的Pods为止。
  • 每次synchronize操作完成一次eviction流程,10s后都会再次循环这个流程。
  • 如果配置了--experimental-kernel-memcg-notification为true,那么会利用kernel memcg notification,当system usage第一时间达到soft & hard memory thresholds时,会立刻通知kubelet,并触发evictionManager.synchronize进行资源回收的流程,这样提高了eviction的实时性。