同行评审过程描述(三)——走查步骤 博客分类: workdocs 工作Access
程序员文章站
2024-02-21 20:02:58
...
6. Walkthrough Procedure(走查步骤)
7. Passaround Procedure(轮查步骤)
Participants 参与者 |
The author selects the participants in a walkthrough. No specific roles are assigned.由创建者选择走查的参与者。不需要分配特定的角色。 | |
Entry Criteria 入口条件 |
o The author selected a walkthrough review approach for the product being reviewed.o 创建者为需要评审的工作产品选择了走查评审方法。o The author has stated his or her objectives for the review.o 创建者陈述了评审目标。 | |
Tasks 任务 |
Task任务 |
Responsible责任人 |
1. Select review participants, obtain their agreement to participate, and schedule a walkthrough meeting.选者评审参与者,确认他们同意参与评审,安排走查会议时间。 | Author创建者 | |
2. Distribute work product to reviewers prior to the meeting.在会议之前分发工作产品给评审者 | Author创建者 | |
3. Describe the work product to the reviewers during the meeting in any appropriate way. Lead discussion on the topics of interest or concerns about the work product.在会议期间,以适当的方式向评审者描述工作产品。针对工作产品中关心的或感兴趣的议题组织讨论。 | Author创建者 | |
4. Present comments, possible defects, and improvement suggestions to the author.向创建者表述评论,可能的缺陷,和改进建议。 | Reviewers评审者 | |
5. Based on reviewer comments, perform any necessary rework of the work product.基于评审者的评论,对工作产品执行必要的返工 | Author创建者 | |
Deliverables 交付物 |
Modified work product修改的工作产品 | |
Verification 审核 |
No verification of rework is required. Changes are made at the author’s discretion.不需要审核返工工作。根据创建者的判断进行修改。 | |
Exit Criteria 出口条件 |
o The author has made any appropriate changes in the work product.o 创建者已经对工作产品做了恰当的修改。 |
Participants 参与者 |
The author selects the participants in a passaround. No specific roles are assigned. However, it can be beneficial to ask individual reviewers to examine the work product from specific perspectives, such as checking internal cross-references, confirming interface definitions, checking conformance to standards, or identifying grammatical and typographical errors.创建者选择了轮查的参与者。不需要分配特定的角色。但要求各个评审者从不同的角度检查工作产品是很有益的,例如检查内部交叉引用,确认接口定义,检查对标准的服从性,识别语法和排版错误。 | |
Entry Criteria 入口标准 |
o The author selected a passaround review approach.o 创建者选择了轮查评审方法。o The author has stated his or her objectives for the review.o 创建者陈述了评审目标。o The document has been spell-checked.o 文档经过了拼写错误检查。 | |
Tasks 任务 |
Task 任务 |
Responsible 责任人 |
1. Either distribute a physical or electronic copy of the work product to each reviewer, or create a file to which all reviewers have read/write access.将工作产品文档或电子拷贝发送给每个评审者,或者创建一个所有评审者都具有读写权限的文件。 | Author创建者 | |
2. Notify reviewers that work product is available and indicate the date by which review comments are to be provided.通知评审者工作产品已经准备好,指定了评论阶段的结束日期。 | Author创建者 | |
3. Either hand-write comments directly on the work product, or enter comments into the work product file, using a revision marks convention or an annotation feature of the tool being used. If working with an individual copy of the work product, deliver the work product with comments to the author after completing the review.直接在工作产品上手写评论,或者使用工具的修订标记或注释形式将评论添加到工作产品文件中。如果使用的是工作产品的个人拷贝,那么评审结束后将工作产品和评论一起交给创建者。 | Reviewers评审者 | |
4. After the final date of the review period, remove work product from the shared file location and examine added comments.评审阶段结束以后,从共享目录中移走工作产品,并检查添加的评论。 | Author创建者 | |
5. Based on reviewer comments, perform any necessary rework of the work product. 基于评审者的评论,对工作产品执行必要的返工工作。 | Author创建者 | |
6. If a shared file was used to accumulate comments, delete each comment from the work product as it is resolved. Leave any comments that require discussion in the work product until agreement is reached on actions to be taken.如果使用了共享文件收集评论,在解决问题后,要从工作产品中删除评论。需要讨论的评论要保留在工作产品上,直到对其处理方法达成一致。 | Author创建者 | |
Deliverables 交付物 |
Modified work product修改后的工作产品 | |
Verification 审核 |
No verification of rework is required. The author is responsible for making appropriate decisions on issues and for correctly performing any rework.不需要审核返工工作。创建者负责对问题的处理决定和返工工作的正确执行。 | |
Exit Criteria 出口条件 |
o The author has addressed all review issues raised.o 创建者已经对应了评审中的所有问题。 |
上一篇: Oracle 空值(null)有关的函数
下一篇: 程序员对英语的依赖 英语程序猿