欢迎您访问程序员文章站本站旨在为大家提供分享程序员计算机编程知识!
您现在的位置是: 首页  >  IT编程

将MySQL去重操作优化到极致的操作方法

程序员文章站 2022-07-09 13:31:46
•问题提出 源表t_source结构如下: item_id int, created_time datetime, modified_t...

•问题提出

源表t_source结构如下:

item_id int,
 created_time datetime,
 modified_time datetime,
 item_name varchar(20),
 other varchar(20)

要求:

1.源表中有100万条数据,其中有50万created_time和item_name重复。
2.要把去重后的50万数据写入到目标表。
3.重复created_time和item_name的多条数据,可以保留任意一条,不做规则限制。

•实验环境

linux虚机:centos release 6.4;8g物理内存(mysql配置4g);100g机械硬盘;双物理cpu双核,共四个处理器;mysql 8.0.16。

•建立测试表和数据

-- 建立源表
create table t_source 
( item_id int, 
 created_time datetime, 
 modified_time datetime, 
 item_name varchar(20), 
 other varchar(20) 
); 
-- 建立目标表
create table t_target like t_source; 
-- 生成100万测试数据,其中有50万created_time和item_name重复
delimiter // 
create procedure sp_generate_data() 
begin 
 set @i := 1; 
 while @i<=500000 do 
 set @created_time := date_add('2017-01-01',interval @i second); 
 set @modified_time := @created_time; 
 set @item_name := concat('a',@i); 
 insert into t_source 
 values (@i,@created_time,@modified_time,@item_name,'other'); 
 set @i:=@i+1; 
 end while; 
 commit; 
 set @last_insert_id := 500000; 
 insert into t_source 
 select item_id + @last_insert_id, 
 created_time, 
 date_add(modified_time,interval @last_insert_id second), 
 item_name, 
 'other' 
 from t_source; 
 commit;
end 
// 
delimiter ; 
call sp_generate_data(); 

-- 源表没有主键或唯一性约束,有可能存在两条完全一样的数据,所以再插入一条记录模拟这种情况。
insert into t_source select * from t_source where item_id=1;

 源表中有1000001条记录,去重后的目标表应该有500000条记录。
mysql> select count(*),count(distinct created_time,item_name) from t_source;
+----------+----------------------------------------+
| count(*) | count(distinct created_time,item_name) |
+----------+----------------------------------------+
| 1000001 |   500000 |
+----------+----------------------------------------+
1 row in set (1.92 sec)

一、巧用索引与变量

1. 无索引对比测试

(1)使用相关子查询

truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select distinct t1.* from t_source t1 where item_id in 
(select min(item_id) from t_source t2 where t1.created_time=t2.created_time and t1.item_name=t2.item_name);

这个语句很长时间都出不来结果,只看一下执行计划吧。

mysql> explain select distinct t1.* from t_source t1 where item_id in 
 -> (select min(item_id) from t_source t2 where t1.created_time=t2.created_time and t1.item_name=t2.item_name); 
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra  |
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| 1 | primary | t1 | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 100.00 | using where; using temporary |
| 2 | dependent subquery | t2 | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 1.00 | using where  |
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
2 rows in set, 3 warnings (0.00 sec)

主查询和相关子查询都是全表扫描,一共要扫描100万*100万数据行,难怪出不来结果。

(2)使用表连接

truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select distinct t1.* from t_source t1, 
(select min(item_id) item_id,created_time,item_name from t_source group by created_time,item_name) t2 
where t1.item_id = t2.item_id;

这种方法用时14秒,查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select distinct t1.* from t_source t1, (select min(item_id) item_id,created_time,item_name from t_source group by created_time,item_name) t2 where t1.item_id = t2.item_id;
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra  |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| 1 | primary | t1 | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 100.00 | using where; using temporary |
| 1 | primary | <derived2> | null | ref | <auto_key0> | <auto_key0> | 5 | test.t1.item_id | 10 | 100.00 | distinct  |
| 2 | derived | t_source | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 100.00 | using temporary |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
3 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

•内层查询扫描t_source表的100万行,建立临时表,找出去重后的最小item_id,生成导出表derived2,此导出表有50万行。
•mysql会在导出表derived2上自动创建一个item_id字段的索引auto_key0。
•外层查询也要扫描t_source表的100万行数据,在与导出表做链接时,对t_source表每行的item_id,使用auto_key0索引查找导出表中匹配的行,并在此时优化distinct操作,在找到第一个匹配的行后即停止查找同样值的动作。

(3)使用变量

set @a:='1000-01-01 00:00:00'; 
set @b:=' '; 
set @f:=0; 
truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select item_id,created_time,modified_time,item_name,other 
 from 
(select t0.*,if(@a=created_time and @b=item_name,@f:=0,@f:=1) f, @a:=created_time,@b:=item_name 
 from 
(select * from t_source order by created_time,item_name) t0) t1 where f=1;

这种方法用时13秒,查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select item_id,created_time,modified_time,item_name,other 
 -> from 
 -> (select t0.*,if(@a=created_time and @b=item_name,@f:=0,@f:=1) f, @a:=created_time,@b:=item_name 
 -> from 
 -> (select * from t_source order by created_time,item_name) t0) t1 where f=1; 
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
| 1 | primary | <derived2> | null | ref | <auto_key0> | <auto_key0> | 4 | const | 10 | 100.00 | null |
| 2 | derived | <derived3> | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 100.00 | null |
| 3 | derived | t_source | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997282 | 100.00 | using filesort |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
3 rows in set, 5 warnings (0.00 sec)

•最内层的查询扫描t_source表的100万行,并使用文件排序,生成导出表derived3。
•第二层查询要扫描derived3的100万行,生成导出表derived2,完成变量的比较和赋值,并自动创建一个导出列f上的索引auto_key0。
•最外层使用auto_key0索引扫描derived2得到去重的结果行。

与上面方法2比较,总的扫描行数不变,都是200万行。只存在一点微小的差别,这次自动生成的索引是在常量列 f 上,而表关联自动生成的索引是在item_id列上,所以查询时间几乎相同。

至此,我们还没有在源表上创建任何索引。无论使用哪种写法,要查重都需要对created_time和item_name字段进行排序,因此很自然地想到,如果在这两个字段上建立联合索引,利用索引本身有序的特性消除额外排序,从而提高查询性能。

2. 建立created_time和item_name上的联合索引对比测试

-- 建立created_time和item_name字段的联合索引
create index idx_sort on t_source(created_time,item_name,item_id); 
analyze table t_source;

(1)使用相关子查询

truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select distinct t1.* from t_source t1 where item_id in 
(select min(item_id) from t_source t2 where t1.created_time=t2.created_time and t1.item_name=t2.item_name);

本次用时19秒,查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select distinct t1.* from t_source t1 where item_id in 
 -> (select min(item_id) from t_source t2 where t1.created_time=t2.created_time and t1.item_name=t2.item_name); 
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+----------+---------+----------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref   | rows | filtered | extra  |
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+----------+---------+----------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| 1 | primary | t1 | null | all | null | null | null | null   | 997281 | 100.00 | using where; using temporary |
| 2 | dependent subquery | t2 | null | ref | idx_sort | idx_sort | 89 | test.t1.created_time,test.t1.item_name | 2 | 100.00 | using index  |
+----+--------------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+----------+---------+----------------------------------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
2 rows in set, 3 warnings (0.00 sec)

•外层查询的t_source表是驱动表,需要扫描100万行。

•对于驱动表每行的item_id,通过idx_sort索引查询出两行数据。

(2)使用表连接

truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select distinct t1.* from t_source t1, 
(select min(item_id) item_id,created_time,item_name from t_source group by created_time,item_name) t2 
where t1.item_id = t2.item_id;

本次用时13秒,查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select distinct t1.* from t_source t1, 
 -> (select min(item_id) item_id,created_time,item_name from t_source group by created_time,item_name) t2 
 -> where t1.item_id = t2.item_id; 
+----+-------------+------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra  |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
| 1 | primary | t1 | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997281 | 100.00 | using where; using temporary |
| 1 | primary | <derived2> | null | ref | <auto_key0> | <auto_key0> | 5 | test.t1.item_id | 10 | 100.00 | distinct  |
| 2 | derived | t_source | null | index | idx_sort | idx_sort | 94 | null | 997281 | 100.00 | using index  |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+-------+---------------+-------------+---------+-----------------+--------+----------+------------------------------+
3 rows in set, 1 warning (0.00 sec)

和没有索引相比,子查询虽然从全表扫描变为了全索引扫描,但还是需要扫描100万行记录。因此查询性能提升并不是明显。

(3)使用变量

set @a:='1000-01-01 00:00:00'; 
set @b:=' '; 
set @f:=0; 
truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select item_id,created_time,modified_time,item_name,other 
 from 
(select t0.*,if(@a=created_time and @b=item_name,@f:=0,@f:=1) f, @a:=created_time,@b:=item_name 
 from 
(select * from t_source order by created_time,item_name) t0) t1 where f=1; 

本次用时13秒,查询计划与没有索引时的完全相同。可见索引对这种写法没有作用。能不能消除嵌套,只用一层查询出结果呢?

(4)使用变量,并且消除嵌套查询

set @a:='1000-01-01 00:00:00'; 
set @b:=' '; 
truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select * from t_source force index (idx_sort) 
 where (@a!=created_time or @b!=item_name) and (@a:=created_time) is not null and (@b:=item_name) is not null 
 order by created_time,item_name;

本次用时12秒,查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select * from t_source force index (idx_sort) 
 -> where (@a!=created_time or @b!=item_name) and (@a:=created_time) is not null and (@b:=item_name) is not null 
 -> order by created_time,item_name;
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-------------+
| 1 | simple | t_source | null | index | null | idx_sort | 94 | null | 997281 | 99.00 | using where |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-------------+
1 row in set, 3 warnings (0.00 sec)

该语句具有以下特点:

•消除了嵌套子查询,只需要对t_source表进行一次全索引扫描,查询计划已达最优。
•无需distinct二次查重。
•变量判断与赋值只出现在where子句中。
•利用索引消除了filesort。

在mysql 8之前,该语句是单线程去重的最佳解决方案。仔细分析这条语句,发现它巧妙地利用了sql语句的逻辑查询处理步骤和索引特性。一条sql查询的逻辑步骤为:

1.执行笛卡尔乘积(交叉连接)
2.应用on筛选器(连接条件)
3.添加外部行(outer join)
4.应用where筛选器
5.分组
6.应用cube或rollup
7.应用having筛选器
8.处理select列表
9.应用distinct子句
10.应用order by子句
11.应用limit子句

每条查询语句的逻辑执行步骤都是这11步的子集。拿这条查询语句来说,其执行顺序为:强制通过索引idx_sort查找数据行 -> 应用where筛选器 -> 处理select列表 -> 应用order by子句。

为了使变量能够按照created_time和item_name的排序顺序进行赋值和比较,必须按照索引顺序查找数据行。这里的force index (idx_sort)提示就起到了这个作用,必须这样写才能使整条查重语句成立。否则,因为先扫描表才处理排序,因此不能保证变量赋值的顺序,也就不能确保查询结果的正确性。order by子句同样不可忽略,否则即使有force index提示,mysql也会使用全表扫描而不是全索引扫描,从而使结果错误。索引同时保证了created_time,item_name的顺序,避免了文件排序。force index (idx_sort)提示和order by子句缺一不可,索引idx_sort在这里可谓恰到好处、一举两得。

查询语句开始前,先给变量初始化为数据中不可能出现的值,然后进入where子句从左向右判断。先比较变量和字段的值,再将本行created_time和item_name的值赋给变量,按created_time、item_name的顺序逐行处理。item_name是字符串类型,(@b:=item_name)不是有效的布尔表达式,因此要写成(@b:=item_name) is not null。

最后补充一句,这里忽略了“insert into t_target select * from t_source group by created_time,item_name;”的写法,因为它受“sql_mode='only_full_group_by'”的限制。

二、利用窗口函数

mysql 8中新增的窗口函数使得原来麻烦的去重操作变得很简单。

truncate t_target; 
insert into t_target 
select item_id, created_time, modified_time, item_name, other
 from (select *, row_number() over(partition by created_time,item_name) as rn
 from t_source) t where rn=1;

这个语句执行只需要12秒,而且写法清晰易懂,其查询计划如下:

mysql> explain select item_id, created_time, modified_time, item_name, other
 -> from (select *, row_number() over(partition by created_time,item_name) as rn
 -> from t_source) t where rn=1;
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
| 1 | primary | <derived2> | null | ref | <auto_key0> | <auto_key0> | 8 | const | 10 | 100.00 | null |
| 2 | derived | t_source | null | all | null | null | null | null | 997281 | 100.00 | using filesort |
+----+-------------+------------+------------+------+---------------+-------------+---------+-------+--------+----------+----------------+
2 rows in set, 2 warnings (0.00 sec)

该查询对t_source表进行了一次全表扫描,同时用filesort对表按分区字段created_time、item_name进行了排序。外层查询从每个分区中保留一条数据。因为重复created_timeitem_name的多条数据中可以保留任意一条,所以oevr中不需要使用order by子句。

从执行计划看,窗口函数去重语句似乎没有消除嵌套查询的变量去重好,但此方法实际执行是最快的。

mysql窗口函数说明参见“https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/window-functions.html”。

三、多线程并行执行

前面已经将单条查重语句调整到最优,但还是以单线程方式执行。能否利用多处理器,让去重操作多线程并行执行,从而进一步提高速度呢?比如我的实验环境是4处理器,如果使用4个线程同时执行查重sql,理论上应该接近4倍的性能提升。

1. 数据分片

在生成测试数据时,created_time采用每条记录加一秒的方式,也就是最大和在最小的时间差为50万秒,而且数据均匀分布,因此先把数据平均分成4份。

(1)查询出4份数据的created_time边界值

mysql> select date_add('2017-01-01',interval 125000 second) dt1,
 -> date_add('2017-01-01',interval 2*125000 second) dt2,
 -> date_add('2017-01-01',interval 3*125000 second) dt3,
 -> max(created_time) dt4
 -> from t_source;
+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| dt1   | dt2   | dt3   | dt4   |
+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
| 2017-01-02 10:43:20 | 2017-01-03 21:26:40 | 2017-01-05 08:10:00 | 2017-01-06 18:53:20 |
+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+---------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

(2)查看每份数据的记录数,确认数据平均分布

mysql> select case when created_time >= '2017-01-01' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  then '2017-01-01'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  then '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  then '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  else '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  end min_dt,
 -> case when created_time >= '2017-01-01' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  then '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  then '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  then '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  else '2017-01-06 18:53:20'
 ->  end max_dt,
 -> count(*)
 -> from t_source
 -> group by case when created_time >= '2017-01-01' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  then '2017-01-01'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  then '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  then '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  else '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  end,
 -> case when created_time >= '2017-01-01' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  then '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-02 10:43:20'
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  then '2017-01-03 21:26:40'
 ->  when created_time >= '2017-01-03 21:26:40' 
 ->  and created_time < '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  then '2017-01-05 08:10:00'
 ->  else '2017-01-06 18:53:20'
 ->  end;
+---------------------+---------------------+----------+
| min_dt  | max_dt  | count(*) |
+---------------------+---------------------+----------+
| 2017-01-01  | 2017-01-02 10:43:20 | 249999 |
| 2017-01-02 10:43:20 | 2017-01-03 21:26:40 | 250000 |
| 2017-01-03 21:26:40 | 2017-01-05 08:10:00 | 250000 |
| 2017-01-05 08:10:00 | 2017-01-06 18:53:20 | 250002 |
+---------------------+---------------------+----------+
4 rows in set (4.86 sec)

4份数据的并集应该覆盖整个源数据集,并且数据之间是不重复的。也就是说4份数据的created_time要连续且互斥,连续保证处理全部数据,互斥确保了不需要二次查重。实际上这和时间范围分区的概念类似,或许用分区表更好些,只是这里省略了重建表的步骤。

2. 建立查重的存储过程

有了以上信息我们就可以写出4条语句处理全部数据。为了调用接口尽量简单,建立下面的存储过程。

delimiter //
create procedure sp_unique(i smallint) 
begin 
 set @a:='1000-01-01 00:00:00'; 
 set @b:=' '; 
 if (i<4) then
 insert into t_target 
 select * from t_source force index (idx_sort) 
  where created_time >= date_add('2017-01-01',interval (i-1)*125000 second) 
  and created_time < date_add('2017-01-01',interval i*125000 second) 
  and (@a!=created_time or @b!=item_name) 
  and (@a:=created_time) is not null 
  and (@b:=item_name) is not null 
  order by created_time,item_name; 
 else 
 insert into t_target 
 select * from t_source force index (idx_sort) 
  where created_time >= date_add('2017-01-01',interval (i-1)*125000 second) 
  and created_time <= date_add('2017-01-01',interval i*125000 second) 
  and (@a!=created_time or @b!=item_name) 
  and (@a:=created_time) is not null 
  and (@b:=item_name) is not null 
  order by created_time,item_name; 
 end if; 
end 
//

查询语句的执行计划如下:

mysql> explain select * from t_source force index (idx_sort) 
 ->  where created_time >= date_add('2017-01-01',interval (1-1)*125000 second) 
 ->  and created_time < date_add('2017-01-01',interval 1*125000 second) 
 ->  and (@a!=created_time or @b!=item_name) 
 ->  and (@a:=created_time) is not null 
 ->  and (@b:=item_name) is not null 
 ->  order by created_time,item_name; 
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | filtered | extra   |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
| 1 | simple | t_source | null | range | idx_sort | idx_sort | 6 | null | 498640 | 100.00 | using index condition |
+----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+----------+---------+------+--------+----------+-----------------------+
1 row in set, 3 warnings (0.00 sec)

mysql优化器进行索引范围扫描,并且使用索引条件下推(icp)优化查询。

3. 并行执行

下面分别使用shell后台进程和mysql schedule event实现并行。

(1)shell后台进程

•建立duplicate_removal.sh文件,内容如下:

#!/bin/bash
mysql -vvv -u root -p123456 test -e "truncate t_target" &>/dev/null 
date '+%h:%m:%s'
for y in {1..4}
do
 sql="call sp_unique($y)"
 mysql -vvv -u root -p123456 test -e "$sql" &>par_sql1_$y.log &
done
wait
date '+%h:%m:%s'

•执行脚本文件

./duplicate_removal.sh

执行输出如下:

[mysql@hdp2~]$./duplicate_removal.sh
14:27:30
14:27:35

这种方法用时5秒,并行执行的4个过程调用分别用时为4.87秒、4.88秒、4.91秒、4.73秒:

[mysql@hdp2~]$cat par_sql1_1.log | sed '/^$/d'
mysql: [warning] using a password on the command line interface can be insecure.
--------------
call sp_unique(1)
--------------
query ok, 124999 rows affected (4.87 sec)
bye
[mysql@hdp2~]$cat par_sql1_2.log | sed '/^$/d'
mysql: [warning] using a password on the command line interface can be insecure.
--------------
call sp_unique(2)
--------------
query ok, 125000 rows affected (4.88 sec)
bye
[mysql@hdp2~]$cat par_sql1_3.log | sed '/^$/d'
mysql: [warning] using a password on the command line interface can be insecure.
--------------
call sp_unique(3)
--------------
query ok, 125000 rows affected (4.91 sec)
bye
[mysql@hdp2~]$cat par_sql1_4.log | sed '/^$/d'
mysql: [warning] using a password on the command line interface can be insecure.
--------------
call sp_unique(4)
--------------
query ok, 125001 rows affected (4.73 sec)
bye
[mysql@hdp2~]$

可以看到,每个过程的执行时间均4.85,因为是并行执行,总的过程执行时间为最慢的4.91秒,比单线程速度提高了2.5倍。

(2)mysql schedule event

•建立事件历史日志表

-- 用于查看事件执行时间等信息
create table t_event_history ( 
 dbname varchar(128) not null default '', 
 eventname varchar(128) not null default '', 
 starttime datetime(3) not null default '1000-01-01 00:00:00', 
 endtime datetime(3) default null, 
 issuccess int(11) default null, 
 duration int(11) default null, 
 errormessage varchar(512) default null, 
 randno int(11) default null
);

•为每个并发线程创建一个事件

delimiter //
create event ev1 on schedule at current_timestamp + interval 1 hour on completion preserve disable do 
begin
 declare r_code char(5) default '00000'; 
 declare r_msg text; 
 declare v_error integer; 
 declare v_starttime datetime default now(3); 
 declare v_randno integer default floor(rand()*100001); 
 insert into t_event_history (dbname,eventname,starttime,randno) 
 #作业名 
 values(database(),'ev1', v_starttime,v_randno); 
 begin 
 #异常处理段 
 declare continue handler for sqlexception 
 begin 
  set v_error = 1; 
  get diagnostics condition 1 r_code = returned_sqlstate , r_msg = message_text; 
 end; 
 #此处为实际调用的用户程序过程 
 call sp_unique(1); 
 end; 
 update t_event_history set endtime=now(3),issuccess=isnull(v_error),duration=timestampdiff(microsecond,starttime,now(3)), errormessage=concat('error=',r_code,', message=',r_msg),randno=null where starttime=v_starttime and randno=v_randno; 
end
// 
create event ev2 on schedule at current_timestamp + interval 1 hour on completion preserve disable do 
begin
 declare r_code char(5) default '00000'; 
 declare r_msg text; 
 declare v_error integer; 
 declare v_starttime datetime default now(3); 
 declare v_randno integer default floor(rand()*100001); 
 insert into t_event_history (dbname,eventname,starttime,randno) 
 #作业名 
 values(database(),'ev2', v_starttime,v_randno); 
 begin 
 #异常处理段 
 declare continue handler for sqlexception 
 begin 
  set v_error = 1; 
  get diagnostics condition 1 r_code = returned_sqlstate , r_msg = message_text; 
 end; 
 #此处为实际调用的用户程序过程 
 call sp_unique(2); 
 end; 
 update t_event_history set endtime=now(3),issuccess=isnull(v_error),duration=timestampdiff(microsecond,starttime,now(3)), errormessage=concat('error=',r_code,', message=',r_msg),randno=null where starttime=v_starttime and randno=v_randno; 
end
// 
create event ev3 on schedule at current_timestamp + interval 1 hour on completion preserve disable do 
begin
 declare r_code char(5) default '00000'; 
 declare r_msg text; 
 declare v_error integer; 
 declare v_starttime datetime default now(3); 
 declare v_randno integer default floor(rand()*100001); 
 insert into t_event_history (dbname,eventname,starttime,randno) 
 #作业名 
 values(database(),'ev3', v_starttime,v_randno); 
 begin 
 #异常处理段 
 declare continue handler for sqlexception 
 begin 
  set v_error = 1; 
  get diagnostics condition 1 r_code = returned_sqlstate , r_msg = message_text; 
 end; 
 #此处为实际调用的用户程序过程 
 call sp_unique(3); 
 end; 
 update t_event_history set endtime=now(3),issuccess=isnull(v_error),duration=timestampdiff(microsecond,starttime,now(3)), errormessage=concat('error=',r_code,', message=',r_msg),randno=null where starttime=v_starttime and randno=v_randno; 
end
// 
create event ev4 on schedule at current_timestamp + interval 1 hour on completion preserve disable do 
begin
 declare r_code char(5) default '00000'; 
 declare r_msg text; 
 declare v_error integer; 
 declare v_starttime datetime default now(3); 
 declare v_randno integer default floor(rand()*100001); 
 insert into t_event_history (dbname,eventname,starttime,randno) 
 #作业名 
 values(database(),'ev4', v_starttime,v_randno); 
 begin 
 #异常处理段 
 declare continue handler for sqlexception 
 begin 
  set v_error = 1; 
  get diagnostics condition 1 r_code = returned_sqlstate , r_msg = message_text; 
 end; 
 #此处为实际调用的用户程序过程 
 call sp_unique(4); 
 end; 
 update t_event_history set endtime=now(3),issuccess=isnull(v_error),duration=timestampdiff(microsecond,starttime,now(3)), errormessage=concat('error=',r_code,', message=',r_msg),randno=null where starttime=v_starttime and randno=v_randno; 
end
//

为了记录每个事件执行的时间,在事件定义中增加了操作日志表的逻辑,因为每个事件中只多执行了一条insert,一条update,4个事件总共多执行8条很简单的语句,对测试的影响可以忽略不计。执行时间精确到毫秒。

•触发事件执行

mysql -vvv -u root -p123456 test -e "truncate t_target;alter event ev1 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev2 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev3 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev4 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;"

该命令行顺序触发了4个事件,但不会等前一个执行完才执行下一个,而是立即向下执行。这可从命令的输出可以清除看到:

[mysql@hdp2~]$mysql -vvv -u root -p123456 test -e "truncate t_target;alter event ev1 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev2 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev3 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;alter event ev4 on schedule at current_timestamp enable;"
mysql: [warning] using a password on the command line interface can be insecure.
--------------
truncate t_target
--------------
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)
--------------
alter event ev1 on schedule at current_timestamp enable
--------------
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
--------------
alter event ev2 on schedule at current_timestamp enable
--------------
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
--------------
alter event ev3 on schedule at current_timestamp enable
--------------
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.02 sec)
--------------
alter event ev4 on schedule at current_timestamp enable
--------------
query ok, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
bye
[mysql@hdp2~]$

•查看事件执行日志

mysql> select * from test.t_event_history;
+--------+-----------+-------------------------+-------------------------+-----------+----------+--------------+--------+
| dbname | eventname | starttime  | endtime   | issuccess | duration | errormessage | randno |
+--------+-----------+-------------------------+-------------------------+-----------+----------+--------------+--------+
| test | ev1 | 2019-07-31 14:38:04.000 | 2019-07-31 14:38:09.389 |  1 | 5389000 | null  | null |
| test | ev2 | 2019-07-31 14:38:04.000 | 2019-07-31 14:38:09.344 |  1 | 5344000 | null  | null |
| test | ev3 | 2019-07-31 14:38:05.000 | 2019-07-31 14:38:09.230 |  1 | 4230000 | null  | null |
| test | ev4 | 2019-07-31 14:38:05.000 | 2019-07-31 14:38:09.344 |  1 | 4344000 | null  | null |
+--------+-----------+-------------------------+-------------------------+-----------+----------+--------------+--------+
4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

可以看到,每个过程的执行均为4.83秒,又因为是并行执行的,因此总的执行之间为最慢的5.3秒,优化效果和shell后台进程方式几乎相同。

总结

以上所述是小编给大家介绍的将mysql去重操作优化到极致的操作方法,希望对大家有所帮助