Angularjs 1.3 中的$parse实例代码
这次我们来看一下angular的sandboxing angular expressions。关于内置方法的,核心有两块:lexer和parser。其中大家对$parse可能更了解一点。好了不多废话,先看lexer的内部结构:
1.lexer
//构造函数 var lexer = function(options) { this.options = options; }; //原型 lexer.prototype = { constructor: lexer, lex: function(){}, is: function(){}, peek: function(){ /* 返回表达式的下一个位置的数据,如果没有则返回false */ }, isnumber: function(){ /* 判断当前表达式是否是一个数字 */ }, iswhitespace: function(){/* 判断当前表达式是否是空格符 */}, isident: function(){/* 判断当前表达式是否是英文字符(包含_和$) */}, isexpoperator: function(){/* 判断当时表达式是否是-,+还是数字 */}, throwerror: function(){ /* 抛出异常 */}, readnumber: function(){ /* 读取数字 */}, readident: function(){ /* 读取字符 */}, readstring: function(){ /*读取携带''或""的字符串*/ } };
这里指出一点,因为是表达式。所以类似"123"这类的东西,在lexer看来应该算是数字而非字符串。表达式中的字符串必须使用单引号或者双引号来标识。lexer的核心逻辑在lex方法中:
lex: function(text) { this.text = text; this.index = 0; this.tokens = []; while (this.index < this.text.length) { var ch = this.text.charat(this.index); if (ch === '"' || ch === "'") { /* 尝试判断是否是字符串 */ this.readstring(ch); } else if (this.isnumber(ch) || ch === '.' && this.isnumber(this.peek())) { /* 尝试判断是否是数字 */ this.readnumber(); } else if (this.isident(ch)) { /* 尝试判断是否是字母 */ this.readident(); } else if (this.is(ch, '(){}[].,;:?')) { /* 判断是否是(){}[].,;:? */ this.tokens.push({index: this.index, text: ch}); this.index++; } else if (this.iswhitespace(ch)) { /* 判断是否是空白符 */ this.index++; } else { /* 尝试匹配操作运算 */ var ch2 = ch + this.peek(); var ch3 = ch2 + this.peek(2); var op1 = operators[ch]; var op2 = operators[ch2]; var op3 = operators[ch3]; if (op1 || op2 || op3) { var token = op3 ? ch3 : (op2 ? ch2 : ch); this.tokens.push({index: this.index, text: token, operator: true}); this.index += token.length; } else { this.throwerror('unexpected next character ', this.index, this.index + 1); } } } return this.tokens; }
主要看一下匹配操作运算。这里源码中会调用operators。看一下operators:
var operators = extend(createmap(), { '+':function(self, locals, a, b) { a=a(self, locals); b=b(self, locals); if (isdefined(a)) { if (isdefined(b)) { return a + b; } return a; } return isdefined(b) ? b : undefined;}, '-':function(self, locals, a, b) { a=a(self, locals); b=b(self, locals); return (isdefined(a) ? a : 0) - (isdefined(b) ? b : 0); }, '*':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) * b(self, locals);}, '/':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) / b(self, locals);}, '%':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) % b(self, locals);}, '===':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) === b(self, locals);}, '!==':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) !== b(self, locals);}, '==':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) == b(self, locals);}, '!=':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) != b(self, locals);}, '<':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) < b(self, locals);}, '>':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) > b(self, locals);}, '<=':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) <= b(self, locals);}, '>=':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) >= b(self, locals);}, '&&':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) && b(self, locals);}, '||':function(self, locals, a, b) {return a(self, locals) || b(self, locals);}, '!':function(self, locals, a) {return !a(self, locals);}, //tokenized as operators but parsed as assignment/filters '=':true, '|':true });
可以看到operators实际上存储的是操作符和操作符函数的键值对。根据操作符返回对应的操作符函数。我们看一下调用例子:
var _l = new lexer({}); var a = _l.lex("a = a + 1"); console.log(a);
结合之前的lex方法,我们来回顾下代码执行过程:
1.index指向'a'是一个字母。匹配isident成功。将生成的token存入tokens中
2.index指向空格符,匹配iswhitespace成功,同上
3.index指向=,匹配操作运算符成功,同上
4.index指向空格符,匹配iswhitespace成功,同上
5.index指向'a'是一个字母。匹配isident成功。同上
7.index指向+,匹配操作运算符成功,同上
8.index指向空格符,匹配iswhitespace成功,同上
9.index指向1,匹配数字成功,同上
以上则是"a = a + 1"的代码执行过程。9步执行结束之后,跳出while循环。刚才我们看到了,每次匹配成功,源码会生成一个token。因为匹配类型的不同,生成出来的token的键值对略有不同:
number:{ index: start, text: number, constant: true, value: number(number) }, string: { index: start, text: rawstring, constant: true, value: string }, ident: { index: start, text: this.text.slice(start, this.index), identifier: true /* 字符表示 */ }, '(){}[].,;:?': { index: this.index, text: ch }, "操作符": { index: this.index, text: token, operator: true } //text是表达式,而value才是实际的值
number和string其实都有相对应的真实值,意味着如果我们表达式是2e2,那number生成的token的值value就应该是200。到此我们通过lexer类获得了一个具有token值得数组。从外部看,实际上lexer是将我们输入的表达式解析成了token json。可以理解为生成了表达式的语法树(ast)。但是目前来看,我们依旧还没有能获得我们定义表达式的结果。那就需要用到parser了。
2.parser
先看一下parser的内部结构:
//构造函数 var parser = function(lexer, $filter, options) { this.lexer = lexer; this.$filter = $filter; this.options = options; }; //原型 parser.prototype = { constructor: parser, parse: function(){}, primary: function(){}, throwerror: function(){ /* 语法抛错 */}, peektoken: function(){}, peek: function(){/*返回tokens中的第一个成员对象 */}, peekahead: function(){ /* 返回tokens中指定成员对象,否则返回false */}, expect: function(){ /* 取出tokens中第一个对象,否则返回false */ }, consume: function(){ /* 取出第一个,底层调用expect */ }, unaryfn: function(){ /* 一元操作 */}, binaryfn: function(){ /* 二元操作 */}, identifier: function(){}, constant: function(){}, statements: function(){}, filterchain: function(){}, filter: function(){}, expression: function(){}, assignment: function(){}, ternary: function(){}, logicalor: function(){ /* 逻辑或 */}, logicaland: function(){ /* 逻辑与 */ }, equality: function(){ /* 等于 */ }, relational: function(){ /* 比较关系 */ }, additive: function(){ /* 加法,减法 */ }, multiplicative: function(){ /* 乘法,除法,求余 */ }, unary: function(){ /* 一元 */ }, fieldaccess: function(){}, objectindex: function(){}, functioncall: function(){}, arraydeclaration: function(){}, object: function(){} }
parser的入口方法是parse,内部执行了statements方法。来看下statements:
statements: function() { var statements = []; while (true) { if (this.tokens.length > 0 && !this.peek('}', ')', ';', ']')) statements.push(this.filterchain()); if (!this.expect(';')) { // optimize for the common case where there is only one statement. // todo(size): maybe we should not support multiple statements? return (statements.length === 1) ? statements[0] : function $parsestatements(self, locals) { var value; for (var i = 0, ii = statements.length; i < ii; i++) { value = statements[i](self, locals); } return value; }; } } }
这里我们将tokens理解为表达式,实际上它就是经过表达式通过lexer转换过来的。statements中。如果表达式不以},),;,]开头,将会执行filterchain方法。当tokens检索完成之后,最后返回了一个$parsestatements方法。其实parser中很多方法都返回了类似的对象,意味着返回的内容将需要执行后才能得到结果。
看一下filterchain:
filterchain: function() { /* 针对angular语法的filter */ var left = this.expression(); var token; while ((token = this.expect('|'))) { left = this.filter(left); } return left; }
其中filterchain是针对angular表达式独有的"|"filter写法设计的。我们先绕过这块,进入expression
expression: function() { return this.assignment(); }
再看assignment:
assignment: function() { var left = this.ternary(); var right; var token; if ((token = this.expect('='))) { if (!left.assign) { this.throwerror('implies assignment but [' + this.text.substring(0, token.index) + '] can not be assigned to', token); } right = this.ternary(); return extend(function $parseassignment(scope, locals) { return left.assign(scope, right(scope, locals), locals); }, { inputs: [left, right] }); } return left; }
我们看到了ternary方法。这是一个解析三目操作的方法。与此同时,assignment将表达式以=划分成left和right两块。并且两块都尝试执行ternary。
ternary: function() { var left = this.logicalor(); var middle; var token; if ((token = this.expect('?'))) { middle = this.assignment(); if (this.consume(':')) { var right = this.assignment(); return extend(function $parseternary(self, locals) { return left(self, locals) ? middle(self, locals) : right(self, locals); }, { constant: left.constant && middle.constant && right.constant }); } } return left; }
在解析三目运算之前,又根据?将表达式划分成left和right两块。左侧再去尝试执行logicalor,实际上这是一个逻辑与的解析,按照这个执行流程,我们一下有了思路。这有点类似我们一般写三目时。代码的执行情况,比如: 2 > 2 ? 1 : 0。如果把这个当成表达式,那根据?划分left和right,left就应该是2 > 2,right应该就是 1: 0。然后尝试在left看是否有逻辑或的操作。也就是,parser里面的方法调用的嵌套级数越深,其方法的优先级则越高。好,那我们一口气看看这个最高的优先级在哪?
logicalor -> logicaland -> equality -> relational -> additive -> multiplicative -> unary
好吧,嵌套级数确实有点多。那么我们看下unary。
unary: function() { var token; if (this.expect('+')) { return this.primary(); } else if ((token = this.expect('-'))) { return this.binaryfn(parser.zero, token.text, this.unary()); } else if ((token = this.expect('!'))) { return this.unaryfn(token.text, this.unary()); } else { return this.primary(); } }
这边需要看两个主要的方法,一个是binaryfn和primay。如果判断是-,则必须通过binaryfn去添加函数。看下binaryfn
binaryfn: function(left, op, right, isbranching) { var fn = operators[op]; return extend(function $parsebinaryfn(self, locals) { return fn(self, locals, left, right); }, { constant: left.constant && right.constant, inputs: !isbranching && [left, right] }); }
其中operators是之前聊lexer也用到过,它根据操作符存储相应的操作函数。看一下fn(self, locals, left, right)。而我们随便取operators中的一个例子:
'-':function(self, locals, a, b) { a=a(self, locals); b=b(self, locals); return (isdefined(a) ? a : 0) - (isdefined(b) ? b : 0); }
其中a和b就是left和right,他们其实都是返回的跟之前类似的$parsestatements方法。默认存储着token中的value。经过事先解析好的四则运算来生成最终答案。其实这就是parser的基本功能。至于嵌套,我们可以把它理解为js的操作符的优先级。这样就一目了然了。至于primay方法。塔刷选{ ( 对象做进一步的解析过程。
parser的代码并不复杂,只是函数方法间调用密切,让我们再看一个例子:
var _l = new lexer({}); var _p = new parser(_l); var a = _p.parse("1 + 1 + 2"); console.log(a()); //4
我们看下1+1+2生成的token是什么样的:
[ {"index":0,"text":"1","constant":true,"value":1},{"index":2,"text":"+","operator":true},{"index":4,"text":"1","constant":true,"value":1},{"index":6,"text":"+","operator":true},{"index":8,"text":"2","constant":true,"value":2} ]
parser根据lexer生成的tokens尝试解析。tokens每一个成员都会生成一个函数,其先后执行逻辑按照用户输入的1+1+2的顺序执行。注意像1和2这类constants为true的token,parser会通过constant生成需要的函数$parseconstant,也就是说1+1+2中的两个1和一个2都是返回$parseconstant函数,通过$parsebinaryfn管理加法逻辑。
constant: function() { var value = this.consume().value; return extend(function $parseconstant() { return value; //这个函数执行之后,就是将value值返回。 }, { constant: true, literal: true }); }, binaryfn: function(left, op, right, isbranching) { var fn = operators[op];//加法逻辑 return extend(function $parsebinaryfn(self, locals) { return fn(self, locals, left, right);//left和right分别表示生成的对应函数 }, { constant: left.constant && right.constant, inputs: !isbranching && [left, right] }); }
那我们demo中的a应该返回什么函数呢?当然是$parsebinaryfn。其中的left和right分别是1+1的$parsebinaryfn,right就是2的$parseconstant。
再来一个例子:
var _l = new lexer({}); var _p = new parser(_l); var a = _p.parse('{"name": "hello"}'); console.log(a);
这边我们传入一个json,理论上我们执行完a函数,应该返回一个{name: "hello"}的对象。它调用了parser中的object
object: function() { var keys = [], valuefns = []; if (this.peektoken().text !== '}') { do { if (this.peek('}')) { // support trailing commas per es5.1. break; } var token = this.consume(); if (token.constant) { //把key取出来 keys.push(token.value); } else if (token.identifier) { keys.push(token.text); } else { this.throwerror("invalid key", token); } this.consume(':'); //冒号之后,则是值,将值存在valuefns中 valuefns.push(this.expression()); //根据逗号去迭代下一个 } while (this.expect(',')); } this.consume('}'); return extend(function $parseobjectliteral(self, locals) { var object = {}; for (var i = 0, ii = valuefns.length; i < ii; i++) { object[keys[i]] = valuefns[i](self, locals); } return object; }, { literal: true, constant: valuefns.every(isconstant), inputs: valuefns }); }
比方我们的例子{"name": "hello"},object会将name存在keys中,hello则会生成$parseconstant函数存在valuefns中,最终返回$parseobjectliternal函数。
下一个例子:
var a = _p.parse('{"name": "hello"}["name"]');
这个跟上一个例子的差别在于后面尝试去读取name的值,这边则调用parser中的objectindex方法。
objectindex: function(obj) { var expression = this.text; var indexfn = this.expression(); this.consume(']'); return extend(function $parseobjectindex(self, locals) { var o = obj(self, locals), //parseobjectliteral,实际就是obj i = indexfn(self, locals), //$parseconstant,这里就是name v; ensuresafemembername(i, expression); if (!o) return undefined; v = ensuresafeobject(o[i], expression); return v; }, { assign: function(self, value, locals) { var key = ensuresafemembername(indexfn(self, locals), expression); // prevent overwriting of function.constructor which would break ensuresafeobject check var o = ensuresafeobject(obj(self, locals), expression); if (!o) obj.assign(self, o = {}, locals); return o[key] = value; } }); }
很简单吧,obj[xx]和obj.x类似。大家自行阅读,我们再看一个函数调用的demo
var _l = new lexer({}); var _p = new parser(_l, '', {}); var demo = { "test": function(){ alert("welcome"); } }; var a = _p.parse('test()'); console.log(a(demo));
我们传入一个test的调用。这边调用了parser中的functioncall方法和identifier方法
identifier: function() { var id = this.consume().text; //continue reading each `.identifier` unless it is a method invocation while (this.peek('.') && this.peekahead(1).identifier && !this.peekahead(2, '(')) { id += this.consume().text + this.consume().text; } return getterfn(id, this.options, this.text); }
看一下getterfn方法
... foreach(pathkeys, function(key, index) { ensuresafemembername(key, fullexp); var lookupjs = (index // we simply dereference 's' on any .dot notation ? 's' // but if we are first then we check locals first, and if so read it first : '((l&&l.hasownproperty("' + key + '"))?l:s)') + '.' + key; if (expensivechecks || ispossiblydangerousmembername(key)) { lookupjs = 'eso(' + lookupjs + ', fe)'; needsensuresafeobject = true; } code += 'if(s == null) return undefined;\n' + 's=' + lookupjs + ';\n'; }); code += 'return s;'; /* jshint -w054 */ var evaledfngetter = new function('s', 'l', 'eso', 'fe', code); // s=scope, l=locals, eso=ensuresafeobject /* jshint +w054 */ evaledfngetter.tostring = valuefn(code); ...
这是通过字符串创建一个匿名函数的方法。我们看下demo的test生成了一个什么匿名函数:
function('s', 'l', 'eso', 'fe'){ if(s == null) return undefined; s=((l&&l.hasownproperty("test"))?l:s).test; return s; }
这个匿名函数的意思,需要传入一个上下文,匿名函数通过查找上下文中是否有test属性,如果没有传上下文则直接返回未定义。这也就是为什么我们在生成好的a函数在执行它时需要传入demo对象的原因。最后补一个functioncall
functioncall: function(fngetter, contextgetter) { var argsfn = []; if (this.peektoken().text !== ')') { /* 确认调用时有入参 */ do { //形参存入argsfn argsfn.push(this.expression()); } while (this.expect(',')); } this.consume(')'); var expressiontext = this.text; // we can safely reuse the array across invocations var args = argsfn.length ? [] : null; return function $parsefunctioncall(scope, locals) { var context = contextgetter ? contextgetter(scope, locals) : isdefined(contextgetter) ? undefined : scope; //或者之前创建生成的匿名函数 var fn = fngetter(scope, locals, context) || noop; if (args) { var i = argsfn.length; while (i--) { args[i] = ensuresafeobject(argsfn[i](scope, locals), expressiontext); } } ensuresafeobject(context, expressiontext); ensuresafefunction(fn, expressiontext); // ie doesn't have apply for some native functions //执行匿名函数的时候需要传入上下文 var v = fn.apply ? fn.apply(context, args) : fn(args[0], args[1], args[2], args[3], args[4]); if (args) { // free-up the memory (arguments of the last function call). args.length = 0; } return ensuresafeobject(v, expressiontext); }; }
下面我们看一下$parseprovider,这是一个基于lex和parser函数的angular内置provider。它对scope的api提供了基础支持。
... return function $parse(exp, interceptorfn, expensivechecks) { var parsedexpression, onetime, cachekey; switch (typeof exp) { case 'string': cachekey = exp = exp.trim(); var cache = (expensivechecks ? cacheexpensive : cachedefault); parsedexpression = cache[cachekey]; if (!parsedexpression) { if (exp.charat(0) === ':' && exp.charat(1) === ':') { onetime = true; exp = exp.substring(2); } var parseoptions = expensivechecks ? $parseoptionsexpensive : $parseoptions; //调用lexer和parser var lexer = new lexer(parseoptions); var parser = new parser(lexer, $filter, parseoptions); parsedexpression = parser.parse(exp); //添加$$watchdelegate,为scope部分提供支持 if (parsedexpression.constant) { parsedexpression.$$watchdelegate = constantwatchdelegate; } else if (onetime) { //onetime is not part of the exp passed to the parser so we may have to //wrap the parsedexpression before adding a $$watchdelegate parsedexpression = wrapsharedexpression(parsedexpression); parsedexpression.$$watchdelegate = parsedexpression.literal ? onetimeliteralwatchdelegate : onetimewatchdelegate; } else if (parsedexpression.inputs) { parsedexpression.$$watchdelegate = inputswatchdelegate; } //做相关缓存 cache[cachekey] = parsedexpression; } return addinterceptor(parsedexpression, interceptorfn); case 'function': return addinterceptor(exp, interceptorfn); default: return addinterceptor(noop, interceptorfn); } };
总结:lexer和parser的实现确实让我大开眼界。通过这两个函数,实现了angular自己的语法解析器。逻辑部分还是相对复杂
以上所述是小编给大家介绍的angularjs 1.3 中的$parse实例代码,希望对大家有所帮助
上一篇: Angular使用Md5加密的解决方法