欢迎您访问程序员文章站本站旨在为大家提供分享程序员计算机编程知识!
您现在的位置是: 首页  >  数据库

类似groupby的分组计数功能

程序员文章站 2022-06-11 14:06:05
...

之前同事发过一个语句,实现的功能比较简单,类似group by的分组计数功能,因为where条件有like,又无法用group by来实现。SELECT a.N0,b.N1,c.N2,d.N3,e.N4,f.N5,g.N6,h.N7,i.N8,j.N9 from (select count(*) N0 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord

之前同事发过一个语句,实现的功能比较简单,类似group by的分组计数功能,因为where条件有like,又无法用group by来实现。
SELECT a.N0,b.N1,c.N2,d.N3,e.N4,f.N5,g.N6,h.N7,i.N8,j.N9 from 
 (select count(*) N0 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '0%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_0%') a,
 (select count(*) N1 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '1%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_1%') b,
 (select count(*) N2 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '2%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_2%') c,
 (select count(*) N3 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '3%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_3%') d,
 (select count(*) N4 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '4%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_4%') e,
 (select count(*) N5 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '5%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_5%') f,
 (select count(*) N6 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '6%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_6%') g,
 (select count(*) N7 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '7%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_7%') h,
 (select count(*) N8 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '8%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_8%') i,
 (select count(*) N9 from tbl_loginfo_20141110 where keyrecord like '9%' or keyrecord like 'GJ_9%') j;
 
为了了解语句的性能,我做了如下类似的测试: 
select * from v$version;   --Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
drop table a;
create table a as select * from dba_objects where rownum explain plan for
  2  SELECT a.N0,b.N1,c.N2,d.N3,e.N4,f.N5,g.N6,h.N7,i.N8,j.N9 from
  3   (select count(*) N0 from a where object_name like 'A%' or object_name like 'V%') a,
  4   (select count(*) N1 from a where object_name like 'B%' or object_name like 'V%') b,
  5   (select count(*) N2 from a where object_name like 'C%' or object_name like 'V%') c,
  6   (select count(*) N3 from a where object_name like 'D%' or object_name like 'V%') d,
  7   (select count(*) N4 from a where object_name like 'E%' or object_name like 'V%') e,
  8   (select count(*) N5 from a where object_name like 'F%' or object_name like 'V%') f,
  9   (select count(*) N6 from a where object_name like 'G%' or object_name like 'V%') g,
 10   (select count(*) N7 from a where object_name like 'H%' or object_name like 'V%') h,
 11   (select count(*) N8 from a where object_name like 'I%' or object_name like 'V%') i,
 12   (select count(*) N9 from a where object_name like 'J%' or object_name like 'V%') j;

Explained.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.15
SQL> @getplan
'general,outline,starts'

Enter value for plan type:

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2527411742

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                    | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 |   130 |   123K  (1)| 00:24:46 |
|   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                |      |     1 |   130 |   123K  (1)| 00:24:46 |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS               |      |     1 |   117 |   111K  (1)| 00:22:17 |
|   3 |    NESTED LOOPS              |      |     1 |   104 | 99032   (1)| 00:19:49 |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS             |      |     1 |    91 | 86653   (1)| 00:17:20 |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS            |      |     1 |    78 | 74274   (1)| 00:14:52 |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS           |      |     1 |    65 | 61895   (1)| 00:12:23 |
|   7 |        NESTED LOOPS          |      |     1 |    52 | 49516   (1)| 00:09:55 |
|   8 |         NESTED LOOPS         |      |     1 |    39 | 37137   (1)| 00:07:26 |
|   9 |          NESTED LOOPS        |      |     1 |    26 | 24758   (1)| 00:04:58 |
|  10 |           VIEW               |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  11 |            SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 12 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL| A    | 91587 |  5903K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  13 |           VIEW               |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  14 |            SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 15 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL| A    |   137K|  8831K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  16 |          VIEW                |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  17 |           SORT AGGREGATE     |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 18 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL | A    | 85818 |  5531K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  19 |         VIEW                 |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  20 |          SORT AGGREGATE      |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 21 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL  | A    |   111K|  7158K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  22 |        VIEW                  |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  23 |         SORT AGGREGATE       |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 24 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL   | A    | 86539 |  5577K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  25 |       VIEW                   |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  26 |        SORT AGGREGATE        |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 27 |         TABLE ACCESS FULL    | A    | 91587 |  5903K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  28 |      VIEW                    |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  29 |       SORT AGGREGATE         |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 30 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL     | A    |   228K|    14M| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  31 |     VIEW                     |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  32 |      SORT AGGREGATE          |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 33 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL      | A    | 87981 |  5670K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  34 |    VIEW                      |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  35 |     SORT AGGREGATE           |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 36 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL       | A    | 84376 |  5438K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  37 |   VIEW                       |      |     1 |    13 | 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|  38 |    SORT AGGREGATE            |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|* 39 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL        | A    |   112K|  7251K| 12379   (1)| 00:02:29 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

  12 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'J%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  15 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'I%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  18 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'H%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  21 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'G%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  24 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'F%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  27 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'E%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  30 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'D%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  33 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'C%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  36 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'B%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  39 - filter("OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'A%' OR "OBJECT_NAME" LIKE 'V%')
  
  
  
  
  
--后者执行计划:  
SQL> explain plan for
  2  select
  3  sum(case when object_name like 'A%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N0,
  4  sum(case when object_name like 'B%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N1,
  5  sum(case when object_name like 'C%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N2,
  6  sum(case when object_name like 'D%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N3,
  7  sum(case when object_name like 'E%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N4,
  8  sum(case when object_name like 'F%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N5,
  9  sum(case when object_name like 'G%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N6,
 10  sum(case when object_name like 'H%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N7,
 11  sum(case when object_name like 'I%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N8,
 12  sum(case when object_name like 'J%' or object_name like 'V%' then 1 else 0 end) N9
 13  from a;

Explained.

Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
SQL> @getplan
'general,outline,starts'

Enter value for plan type:

PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3918351354

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation          | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |    66 | 12349   (1)| 00:02:29 |
|   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |    66 |            |          |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| A    |  3097K|   194M| 12349   (1)| 00:02:29 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note
-----
   - dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)  


可以看出,前者10次全表扫描,后者1次全表扫描。从而时间上也大大降低了。由58s降低到19s。
优化这个sql主要还是思路的转换,难点在于怎样把10次全表扫描转化成1次全表扫描。
在OLAP中,可以加并行使sql速度更快。