Redis 2.4与2.6 性能比较
在写基于Mysql Binlog刷新redis缓存的项目时,刚完成部分功能开发,整个流程走通了。突然发现测试机自己安装了redis2.4.2与redis
今天在写基于Mysql Binlog刷新redis缓存的项目时,刚完成部分功能开发,整个流程走通了。突然发现测试机自己安装了redis2.4.2与redis2.6.2两个版本,因此顺手想在测试机上跑下redis相关性能,看有多大的提高:
测试程序是redis自已的redis-benchmark, 参数为:src/redis-benchmark -h host -p port -c 10 -n 100000 -q
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.80GHz 4核,,2G内存:
首先是redis2.4.2:
PING_INLINE: 41305.25 requests per second
PING_BULK: 41649.31 requests per second
SET: 42016.81 requests per second
GET: 41788.55 requests per second
INCR: 41823.50 requests per second
LPUSH: 36179.45 requests per second
LPOP: 41067.76 requests per second
SADD: 41823.50 requests per second
SPOP: 41305.25 requests per second
LPUSH (needed to benchmark LRANGE): 41254.12 requests per second
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements): 17618.04 requests per second
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements): 6311.94 requests per second
LRANGE_500 (first 450 elements): 4240.16 requests per second
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements): 3283.75 requests per second
MSET (10 keys): 24667.00 requests per second
redis.2.6.2:
PING_INLINE: 40849.67 requests per second
PING_BULK: 40371.42 requests per second
SET: 41339.39 requests per second
GET: 41118.42 requests per second
INCR: 41169.21 requests per second
LPUSH: 40144.52 requests per second
LPOP: 41580.04 requests per second
SADD: 42069.84 requests per second
SPOP: 42462.84 requests per second
LPUSH (needed to benchmark LRANGE): 41511.00 requests per second
LRANGE_100 (first 100 elements): 17337.03 requests per second
LRANGE_300 (first 300 elements): 6483.82 requests per second
LRANGE_500 (first 450 elements): 4253.15 requests per second
LRANGE_600 (first 600 elements): 2835.27 requests per second
MSET (10 keys): 19047.62 requests per second
从上面两者所跑数据比较来看,基本上相差不大。redis2.6.2 操作性能甚至有细微的下降,有些又有少量的性能增加。
redis2.6.2新功能介绍 中提到了性能相关的主要有一个是AOF性能的提升以及大数据存储时性能提升。因此相关基本操作,redis在之前版本已经很极致了。
以上数据仅供参考!
推荐阅读
-
C#泛型与非泛型性能比较的实例
-
C#泛型与非泛型性能比较的实例
-
Python数据挖掘(烟火图像分类:传统机器学习建模方法与卷积神经网络性能比较)
-
Python数据挖掘(烟火图像分类:传统机器学习建模方法与卷积神经网络性能比较)
-
JQuery for与each性能比较分析
-
编程杂谈——std::vector与List
的性能比较 -
ASP.NET(C#) String, StringBuilder 与 StringWriter性能比较
-
SQLSERVER2008中CTE的Split与CLR的性能比较
-
IOT项目中Redis与kafka做消息队列比较:Redis逐渐淘汰
-
Redis存取序列化与反序列化性能问题详解