Spring AOP实现原理
AOP的实现者
AOP工具的设计目标是把横切的问题(如性能监视、事务管理)模块化。使用类似于OOP的方式进行切面的编程工作。位于AOP工具核心的是连接点模型,它提供了一种机制,可以识别出在哪里发生了横切。
AspectJ
AspectJ是语言级的AOP实现,2001年由Xerox PARC的AOP小组发布。AspectJ扩展了Java语言,定义了AOP语法,能够在编译器提供横切代码的织入,所以它有一个专门的编译器用来生成遵守Java字节编码规范的Class文件。
AspectWerkz
基于Java的简单、动态、轻量级的AOP框架,2002年发布。支持运行期或类装载期织入横切代码,所以它拥有一个特殊的类装载器。现在已与AspectJ项目合并,合作的第一个版本是AspectJ 5,扩展AspectJ语言,以基于注解的方式支持类似AspectJ的代码风格。
JBoss AOP
2004作为JBoss应用服务器的扩展功能发布。
Spring AOP
Spring AOP 使用纯Java实现,它不需要专门的编译过程,不需要特殊的类装载器,它在运行期通过代理方式想目标类织入增强代码。Spring并不尝试提供最完整的AOP实现,相反,它侧重于提供一种和IoC容器整合的AOP实现,用以解决企业级开发中的常见问题。在Spring中,我们可以无缝地将Spring AOP、IoC和AspectJ整合在一起。
AOP联盟
AOP联盟(aopalliance.sourceforge.net)是众多开源AOP项目的联合组织,该组织的目的是为了制定一套规范描述AOP的标准,定义标准的AOP接口,以便各种遵守标准的具体实现可以相互调用。现以成为事实上的标准。
Spring对AOP的支持
Spring在2.0以后对AOP功能进行了重要的增强,主要表现在以下几个方面:
- 新增了基于Schema的配置支持,为AOP专门提供了aop命名空间。
- 新增了对AspectJ切点表达式语言支持。使用和@AspectJ相同风格的注解,并通过AspectJ提供的注解库和解析库处理切点。当然,由于Spring只支持方法级的切点,所以仅对@AspectJ提供了有限的支持。
- 可以无缝地继承AspectJ,AspectJ提供了语言级切面的实现。
我们所说的Spring AOP,它包括基于XML配置的AOP和基于@AspectJ注解的AOP,这两种方法虽然在配置切面时的表现方式不同,但底层都是采用动态代理技术(JDK代理或CGLib代理)。Spring可以集成AspectJ,但AspectJ本身并不属于Spring AOP的范畴。
在一般情况下,对于开发JAVAEE企业应用的开发者而言,Spring AOP已经可以满足使用的要求,虽然AspectJ提供对AOP更为细致的实现,但像实例化切面、属性访问切面、条件切面等功能在实际应用中并不常用。
如果是基于JDK5.0的项目,推荐使用Spring提供的@AspectJ配置方式,因为这种方式能以更简单的更直接的方式应用切面。
ProxyFactoryBean(aspectj方案则是AspectJProxyFactory)
public Object getObject() throws BeansException { initializeAdvisorChain(); if (isSingleton()) { return getSingletonInstance(); } else { if (this.targetName == null) { logger.warn("Using non-singleton proxies with singleton targets is often undesirable. " + "Enable prototype proxies by setting the 'targetName' property."); } return newPrototypeInstance(); } }
ProxyCreatorSupport
protected final synchronized AopProxy createAopProxy() { if (!this.active) { activate(); } return getAopProxyFactory().createAopProxy(this); }
DefaultAopProxyFactory
public AopProxy createAopProxy(AdvisedSupport config) throws AopConfigException { if (config.isOptimize() || config.isProxyTargetClass() || hasNoUserSuppliedProxyInterfaces(config)) { Class targetClass = config.getTargetClass(); if (targetClass == null) { throw new AopConfigException("TargetSource cannot determine target class: " + "Either an interface or a target is required for proxy creation."); } if (targetClass.isInterface()) { return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config); } return CglibProxyFactory.createCglibProxy(config); } else { return new JdkDynamicAopProxy(config); } }
我们回忆一下我们做过的jdk代理的例子:
UserMgr mgr = new UserMgrImpl(); InvocationHandler h = new TransactionHandler(mgr); UserMgr u = (UserMgr) Proxy.newProxyInstance(UserMgr.class, h);
生成的代理是比如$Proxy34,h是$Proxy34的成员变量,
public class Proxy implements java.io.Serializable { /** prefix for all proxy class names */ private final static String proxyClassNamePrefix = "$Proxy"; /** * the invocation handler for this proxy instance. * @serial */ protected InvocationHandler h; }
在spring aop中正是JdkDynamicAopProxy。那么重点来了,我们就从JdkDynamicAopProxy的invoke方法看起:
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable { MethodInvocation invocation; Object oldProxy = null; boolean setProxyContext = false; TargetSource targetSource = this.advised.targetSource; Class<?> targetClass = null; Object target = null; try { if (!this.equalsDefined && AopUtils.isEqualsMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the equals(Object) method itself. return equals(args[0]); } if (!this.hashCodeDefined && AopUtils.isHashCodeMethod(method)) { // The target does not implement the hashCode() method itself. return hashCode(); } if (!this.advised.opaque && method.getDeclaringClass().isInterface() && method.getDeclaringClass().isAssignableFrom(Advised.class)) { // Service invocations on ProxyConfig with the proxy config... return AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(this.advised, method, args); } Object retVal; if (this.advised.exposeProxy) { // Make invocation available if necessary. oldProxy = AopContext.setCurrentProxy(proxy); setProxyContext = true; } // May be null. Get as late as possible to minimize the time we "own" the target, // in case it comes from a pool. target = targetSource.getTarget(); if (target != null) { targetClass = target.getClass(); } // Get the interception chain for this method. List<Object> chain = this.advised.getInterceptorsAndDynamicInterceptionAdvice(method, targetClass); // Check whether we have any advice. If we don't, we can fallback on direct // reflective invocation of the target, and avoid creating a MethodInvocation. if (chain.isEmpty()) { // We can skip creating a MethodInvocation: just invoke the target directly // Note that the final invoker must be an InvokerInterceptor so we know it does // nothing but a reflective operation on the target, and no hot swapping or fancy proxying. retVal = AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(target, method, args); } else { // We need to create a method invocation... invocation = new ReflectiveMethodInvocation(proxy, target, method, args, targetClass, chain); // Proceed to the joinpoint through the interceptor chain. retVal = invocation.proceed(); } // Massage return value if necessary. Class<?> returnType = method.getReturnType(); if (retVal != null && retVal == target && returnType.isInstance(proxy) && !RawTargetAccess.class.isAssignableFrom(method.getDeclaringClass())) { // Special case: it returned "this" and the return type of the method // is type-compatible. Note that we can't help if the target sets // a reference to itself in another returned object. retVal = proxy; } else if (retVal == null && returnType != Void.TYPE && returnType.isPrimitive()) { throw new AopInvocationException( "Null return value from advice does not match primitive return type for: " + method); } return retVal; } finally { if (target != null && !targetSource.isStatic()) { // Must have come from TargetSource. targetSource.releaseTarget(target); } if (setProxyContext) { // Restore old proxy. AopContext.setCurrentProxy(oldProxy); } } }
ReflectiveMethodInvocation implements ProxyMethodInvocation extends MethodInvocation extends Invocation extends Joinpoint
public Object proceed() throws Throwable { // We start with an index of -1 and increment early. if (this.currentInterceptorIndex == this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.size() - 1) { return invokeJoinpoint(); } Object interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice = this.interceptorsAndDynamicMethodMatchers.get(++this.currentInterceptorIndex); if (interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice instanceof InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) { // Evaluate dynamic method matcher here: static part will already have // been evaluated and found to match. InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher dm = (InterceptorAndDynamicMethodMatcher) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice; if (dm.methodMatcher.matches(this.method, this.targetClass, this.arguments)) { return dm.interceptor.invoke(this); } else { // Dynamic matching failed. // Skip this interceptor and invoke the next in the chain. return proceed(); } } else { // eg. ExposeInvocationInterceptor // It's an interceptor, so we just invoke it: The pointcut will have // been evaluated statically before this object was constructed. return ((MethodInterceptor) interceptorOrInterceptionAdvice).invoke(this); } }
package org.aopalliance.intercept; // Aop联盟 import java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject; public interface Joinpoint { Object proceed() throws Throwable; Object getThis(); AccessibleObject getStaticPart(); }
interceptor.invoker - eg. MethodBeforeAdviceInterceptor
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation mi) throws Throwable { this.advice.before(mi.getMethod(), mi.getArguments(), mi.getThis() ); return mi.proceed(); // 又回归到了上面的调用 }
值得注意的是,虽然切面可以只用到一个类的部分方法上,但我们调用其他方法时,仍然会经历上面的逻辑,此时拦截器链里只有一个interceptor - ExposeInvocationInterceptor
public Object invoke(MethodInvocation mi) throws Throwable { MethodInvocation oldInvocation = invocation.get(); invocation.set(mi); try { return mi.proceed(); } finally { invocation.set(oldInvocation); } }
Aop应用参考:
一、分库分表http://wely.iteye.com/blog/2275725
二、方法性能监控
package com.itlong.bjxizhan.support.web.service.monitor; import org.aspectj.lang.ProceedingJoinPoint; import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Around; import org.aspectj.lang.annotation.Aspect; /** * Created by shenhongxi on 2016/8/10. */ @Aspect public class MonitorAspect { private String tagPrefix; @Around( value = "execution(* *(..)) && @annotation(monitor)", argNames = "pjp,monitor" ) public Object doUmpLogging(ProceedingJoinPoint pjp, Monitor monitor) throws Throwable { // String tag = monitor.tag(); // boolean heart = monitor.heart(); long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); // record invocation (times) Object obj = null; try { obj = pjp.proceed(); } catch (Exception e) { // record error throw e; } finally { long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); // record time -> end - start } return obj; } public String getTagPrefix() { return tagPrefix; } public void setTagPrefix(String tagPrefix) { this.tagPrefix = tagPrefix; } } @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME) @Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.CONSTRUCTOR}) public @interface Monitor { String DEFAULT_TAG_NAME = "@@USE_METHOD_NAME"; String tag() default "@@USE_METHOD_NAME"; String message() default ""; boolean heart() default false; }
另外,性能监控拦截器可参考org.springframework.aop.interceptor.PerformanceMonitorInterceptor
下一篇: 命令行DOS下无法使用ping等命令