关于一段代码的疑惑
程序员文章站
2022-04-22 18:00:29
...
今天需要写一段关于输入字符串的check的代码,突然想到equalIrgoreCase貌似功能上比equals更强大,但是为啥很多时候都只用equals 而不用equalIrgoreCase呢?所以就去看了下源代码,结果发现了String类中的一点额外的东西。
源代码如下:
/**
* Compares this string to the specified {@code CharSequence}. The result
* is {@code true} if and only if this {@code String} represents the same
* sequence of char values as the specified sequence.
*
* @param cs
* The sequence to compare this {@code String} against
*
* @return {@code true} if this {@code String} represents the same
* sequence of char values as the specified sequence, {@code
* false} otherwise
*
* @since 1.5
*/
public boolean contentEquals(CharSequence cs) {
if (count != cs.length())
return false;
// Argument is a StringBuffer, StringBuilder
if (cs instanceof AbstractStringBuilder) {
char v1[] = value;
char v2[] = ((AbstractStringBuilder)cs).getValue();
int i = offset;
int j = 0;
int n = count;
while (n-- != 0) {
if (v1[i++] != v2[j++])
return false;
}
}
// Argument is a String
if (cs.equals(this))
return true;
// Argument is a generic CharSequence
char v1[] = value;
int i = offset;
int j = 0;
int n = count;
while (n-- != 0) {
if (v1[i++] != cs.charAt(j++))
return false;
}
return true;
}
我很想知道为什么当
if (cs instanceof AbstractStringBuilder)
{
...
}
成立的时候,为啥结尾不直接返回true呢?如果传入的参数是一个StringBuffer or StringBuilder,则需要遍历两次,这是为什么呢?我感觉添加一个return true 更合理一些,不是吗?如:
// Argument is a StringBuffer, StringBuilder
if (cs instanceof AbstractStringBuilder) {
char v1[] = value;
char v2[] = ((AbstractStringBuilder)cs).getValue();
int i = offset;
int j = 0;
int n = count;
while (n-- != 0) {
if (v1[i++] != v2[j++])
return false;
}
return true;
}