欢迎您访问程序员文章站本站旨在为大家提供分享程序员计算机编程知识!
您现在的位置是: 首页  >  数据库

mysqltimestamp和long存储时间效率比较_MySQL

程序员文章站 2022-06-12 17:07:42
...
show create table 20130107date;

CREATE TABLE `20130107date` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `c_date` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
  `c_date_long` int(20) NOT NULL,
  `idx_date` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
  `idx_date_long` int(11) NOT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `20130107date_idx_date` (`idx_date`),
  KEY `20130107date_idx_long` (`idx_date_long`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB

里面有90w数据,都是随机的时间.
先看没有索引的全表扫描

1 :

select COUNT(*) from 20130107date
where c_date BETWEEN DATE('20110101') and DATE('20110102')

这个需要1.54s

2:

select COUNT(*) from 20130107date
where c_date_long BETWEEN UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110101') and UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110102')

这个是2.3s

但是可以这样搞
3 :

select UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110101'),UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110102');

得到结果1293811200和1293897600

然后

select COUNT(*) from 20130107date
where c_date_long BETWEEN 1293811200 and 1293897600;

发现变成了0.61s
1和2的差距还可以说是比较int和比较timestamp的差距,那么2和3的差距呢?难道多出来的时间是每一条记录都要evaluate UNIX_TIMESTAMP(‘20110102’)?

然后用索引

select COUNT(*) from 20130107date
where idx_date_long BETWEEN UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110101') and UNIX_TIMESTAMP('20110102');

select COUNT(*) from 20130107date
where idx_date BETWEEN '20110101' and '20110102'

毫无悬念,两个基本都是瞬时的.

相关标签: 效率 时间